Samsung Galaxy A57 vs S25 FE

GSMArena Official
GSMArena OfficialMay 29, 2026

Why It Matters

The comparison highlights how Samsung’s mid‑range A57 can deliver flagship‑like experience at a lower price, while the S25 FE retains premium performance and features for power users, informing purchase decisions in a crowded Android market.

Key Takeaways

  • A57 lighter, slimmer, but shares premium build and 6.7‑inch display.
  • S25 FE uses flagship‑grade Exynos 2400, outperforming A57’s Exynos 1680.
  • Battery life favors A57 (≈14 hrs) despite similar capacity.
  • S25 FE adds wireless/reverse charging, better speakers, and telephoto zoom.
  • Price gap ~ $150; choose A57 for value, S25 FE for performance.

Summary

The video pits Samsung’s mid‑range Galaxy A57 against last year’s Galaxy S25 FE to determine which offers the better overall value. Both phones share a premium metal‑glass chassis, IP68 protection and identical 6.7‑inch HDR‑capable displays that peak at over 1,200 nits, delivering the same visual experience.

Key differences emerge in performance and features. The A57 runs the Exynos 1680 mid‑range chipset, while the S25 FE is powered by the flagship‑grade Exynos 2400, delivering markedly higher benchmark scores and smoother multitasking. Battery capacity is nearly identical (5,000 mAh vs 4,900 mAh), yet the A57 lasts about two hours longer in active use thanks to better thermal management. Both support 45 W wired charging, but only the S25 FE adds wireless and reverse‑wireless charging.

Audio and camera capabilities also diverge. The S25 FE’s stereo speakers produce louder, richer sound, and its dedicated 3× telephoto lens outperforms the A57’s digital zoom. Video recording on the S25 FE reaches 4K 120 fps and 8K, whereas the A57 caps at 4K 30 fps. In low‑light stills the main sensors are comparable, but the S25 FE delivers more natural detail and superior night‑mode color rendering.

With roughly a $150 price premium, the S25 FE justifies its cost for users who need flagship‑level processing, advanced camera zoom, wireless charging, and Samsung DeX support. For buyers prioritizing a lighter device, longer battery life, and a lower price, the A57 offers a compelling, feature‑rich alternative.

Original Description

Check out this HEAD-TO-HEAD for the COMPLETE BREAKDOWN of how these two phones compare in terms of screen quality, battery life and charging speed, chipset performance, and camera image quality, all based on our extensive reviews.
▶ Read our detailed text comparison
▶ Check the phone's prices
Note: This is an unbiased, non-sponsored review, but sales commissions may be earned if you make a purchase through the link above.
▶ Check out the full phone's specs
▶ Check out how the phones sound
▶ Get the GSMArena.com merch here: https://merch.gsmarena.com/
********************
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
00:21 - Design and build
00:47 - Screen specs and quality
00:58 - Brightness test
01:10 - Under-display fingerprint reader
01:16 - One UI 8.5 on Android 16
01:29 - Software updates
01:39 - Stereo speakers comparison
02:05 - Chipset and performance
02:20 - Benchmarks (GeekBench6, AnTuTu11, 3D Mark)
02:33 - Battery (4,900mAh; 5,000mAh) endurance
02:50 - Charging (45W) speed
02:59 - Wireless and reverse wireless charging (S25 FE)
03:05 - Camera specs
03:24 - Main cam, daylight photo quality
03:31 - 3x zoom, daylight photo quality
03:40 - Ultrawide, daylight photo quality
03:45 - Main cam, low-light photo quality
03:52 - Telephoto, low-light photo quality (S25 FE)
03:57 - Ultrawide, low-light photo quality
04:02 - Selfies
04:13 - Video recording capabilities
04:24 - Video quality
04:39 - Conclusion
04:46 - Common strengths
05:01 - A57 pros
05:10 - S25 FE pros
05:27 - Verdict

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...