
The raid challenges the post‑Cold War norm against unilateral force, risking a new precedent that could destabilize the Western Hemisphere and strain multilateral institutions.
Operation Absolute Resolve marks a watershed moment in U.S. foreign policy, blending counter‑narcotics objectives with a direct assault on a foreign head of state. While Washington frames the raid as a lawful law‑enforcement action targeting a regime it deems illegitimate, the scale of the operation—air strikes, ground combat, and the capture of a sitting president—pushes the boundaries of traditional counter‑drug missions. This blurring of lines raises questions about the legal thresholds for unilateral force, especially when the target is a sovereign nation with which the U.S. has no formal declaration of war. Analysts note that the precedent set could embolden other powers to justify similar incursions under the banner of combating transnational crime.
The UN Security Council’s emergency session underscored the diplomatic fallout of the raid. A broad coalition of states, from regional neighbors like Colombia and Brazil to global powers such as Russia and China, condemned the operation as a violation of the UN Charter’s prohibitions on the use of force and respect for territorial integrity. Their statements emphasized the danger of eroding the norms that have underpinned international peace since 1945. Meanwhile, the United States, through Ambassador Mike Waltz, maintained that the action was not a war but a targeted law‑enforcement measure, highlighting the tension between legal interpretations and political realities within the Council.
The ramifications for regional stability are immediate and profound. Venezuela’s neighbors, sharing extensive borders and economic ties, now face heightened security concerns and potential refugee flows. The divergent reactions also signal a fracturing of consensus on how to address authoritarian regimes accused of drug trafficking and human rights abuses. As diplomatic channels seek de‑escalation, the episode may catalyze renewed calls for multilateral mechanisms to manage cross‑border crime without resorting to unilateral military force, preserving both regional security and the integrity of international law.
On the morning of Jan. 5, the United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting to discuss Operation Absolute Resolve, the U.S. military effort to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The raid, which took place on Jan. 3, included a bombing campaign to take out the country’s air defenses and a gun battle at Maduro’s compound. According to the country’s interior minister, the operation resulted in at least 100 deaths.
In its letter requesting the Security Council meeting, Venezuela accused the United States of carrying out a series of “brutal, unjustified, and unilateral armed attacks” against civilian and military sites in the country. The meeting was the third in a series of U.N. Security Council briefings convened on recent U.S. activities relating to Venezuela. The first, held in October, was requested by Venezuela over concern for the Trump administration’s military strikes—of which there have now been 38—on boats it alleges are trafficking narcotics. The Security Council also convened in December, again at Venezuela’s request, to discuss “escalating tensions” resulting from U.S. aggression.
During the Jan. 5 meeting, allies and adversaries criticized the U.S. operation, with representatives of Colombia, Russia, Eritrea, and Uganda characterizing the operation as an act of aggression. In addition to Venezuela, a number of countries in the region, including Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Nicaragua, and Cuba, also participated in the meeting. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz pushed back against the criticism, referring to Maduro’s capture as a “law enforcement operation.” There is “no war against Venezuela or its people,” Waltz said.
Below are key excerpts of statements from the Jan. 5 meeting, alongside corresponding timestamps in the publicly-available video.
U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres**, Delivered by** Rosemary DiCarlo, Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs (3:44)
See also: Secretary-General’s Remarks to the Security Council on Venezuela
I remain deeply concerned that rules of international law have not been respected with regard to the 3 January military action. The Charter enshrines the prohibition of the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. The maintenance of international peace and security depends on the continued commitment of all Member States to adhere to all the provisions of the Charter.
Colombia, Delivered by Leonor Zalabata Torres, permanent representative of Colombia to the United Nations (27:55)
Colombia condemns categorically the events that occurred in the early morning of the third of January in Venezuela, where we saw multiple explosions and air activity over Caracas and other areas of the country, as part of a military attack carried out by the United States, which included bombings of civilian and military infrastructure, creating panic amongst the population. All of this represents clear violations of the sovereignty, political independence, and the territorial integrity of Venezuela. There is no justification, whatsoever, under any circumstances for the unilateral use of force to commit an act of aggression. Such actions constitute a serious violation of international law and the United Nations charter, including the prohibition on the use or the threat of the use of force, the principle of the respect for the use of sovereignty, and the full authority of states over their territory including their natural resources.
Russian Federation, Delivered by Vassily Nebenzia, permanent representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations (39:03)
See also: Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at a UNSC Briefing on Venezuela
We firmly condemn the U.S. act of armed aggression against Venezuela in breach of all international legal norms…We cannot allow the United States to proclaim itself as some kind of a supreme judge, which alone bears the right to invade any country, to label culprits, to hand down, and to enforce punishments, irrespective of notions of international law, sovereignty and non intervention.
People’s Republic of China, Delivered by Sun Lei, deputy permanent representative of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations (46:36)
See also: Remarks on Venezuela by Ambassador Sun Lei
As a permanent member of the Council, the U.S. has disregarded the grave concerns of the international community, wantonly trampled upon Venezuela’s sovereignty, security, and legitimate rights and interests, and seriously violated the principles of sovereign equality, non-interference in internal affairs, peaceful settlement of international disputes, and the prohibition of the use of force in international relations. These principles constitute the fundamental tenets of the UN Charter and form the cornerstone of maintaining international peace and security.
Liberia, Delivered by Lewis Brown, permanent representative of Liberia to the United Nations (52:08)
See also: Statement by Amb. Lewis G. Brown at the 10,085th Meeting of the Security Council
Our position underscores the importance of dialog, the peaceful settlement of disputes and respect for Constitutional and institutional frameworks…It’s important for all parties, both within Venezuela and in the broader international community, to exercise restraint and responsibility upholding international law and avoiding any action that could escalate tension or threaten regional stability.
United States, Delivered by Mike Waltz, U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations (57:26)
See also: Remarks at a UN Security Council Briefing on Venezuela
As Secretary Rubio has said, there is no war against Venezuela or its people. We are not occupying a country. This was a law enforcement operation in furtherance of lawful indictments that have existed for decades. The United States arrested a narcotrafficker who is now going to stand trial in the United States in accordance with the rule of law for the crimes he’s committed against our people for 15 years…Maduro is not just an indicted drug trafficker; he was an illegitimate so-called president. He was not a head of state…As Secretary Rubio stated just yesterday, this is the Western Hemisphere. This is where we live–and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be used as a base of operation for our nation’s adversaries, and competitors, and rivals of the United States.
Panama, Delivered by Eloy Alfaro de Alba, permanent representative of Panama to the United Nations (1:08:12)
Panama would like to reiterate our unfailing commitment to multilateralism, to the sovereignty of states and to the unrestricted respect for international law, especially the principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter, including non-intervention, respect for territorial integrity and the prohibition of the use of force. This is mentioned in Article II of the United Nations Charter. These principles are, and they continue to be, the indispensable framework for the peaceful coexistence between nations. Panama also believes it’s necessary to highlight that the situation Venezuela is facing is unfolding in an environment marked by the disregard for the will of its people, as well as by a sustained erosion of democratic institutions.
Latvia, Delivered by Sanita Pavļuta-Deslandes, permanent representative of the Republic of Latvia to the United Nations (01:19:42)
See also: Statement of the Republic of Latvia During UN Security Council’s Emergency Meeting on Venezuela
The Security Council bears primary responsibility for the global efforts to uphold peace, security and rule of law worldwide. Latvia recalls that, under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be upheld. All efforts must now focus on ensuring de-escalation and stability in Venezuela, one based on inclusive dialogue and broad societal support…The Maduro regime does not represent the will of the Venezuelan people and has relied on widespread, systematic repressions of human rights across the country to maintain power…Latvia also remains committed to working together with partners to counter global transnational organized crime networks, including in Latin America and Caribbean.
Denmark, Delivered by Christina Markus Lassen, permanent representative of Denmark to the United Nations (01:22:31)
See also: Statement for Briefing on Venezuela
Today, we echo the Secretary-General in his concern regarding the worrying implications of this military action. Independent of the situation in Venezuela, these developments constitute a dangerous precedent…The principles of sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity must be respected. The inviolability of borders is not up for negotiation…Denmark does not recognise Nicolás Maduro as the legitimate president of Venezuela following the lack of transparency and integrity in the 2024 presidential election, which failed to meet basic democratic standards…The victims of the Maduro regime’s alleged crimes against humanity have to be heard. The Venezuelan people have a right to democracy and self-determination…This includes the right of Venezuelans alone to determine their political, economic, and social future, without coercion, pressure, or manipulation by external actors. No state should seek to influence political outcomes in Venezuela through the use or threat of force, or through other means inconsistent with international law. Venezuela’s future can be decided only by the Venezuelans.
United Kingdom, Delivered by James Kariuki, deputy permanent representative of the U.K. to the United Nations (01:27:44)
See also: Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki
The United Kingdom has long been clear that Maduro’s claim to power was fraudulent…the United Kingdom reaffirms its commitment to international law and the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
France, Delivered by Jay Dharmadhikari, deputy permanent representative of France to the United Nations (01:29:51)
See also: Statement by Mr. Jay Dharmadhikari, Deputy Permanent Representative of France to the UN
The military operation which has led to the capture of Nicolás Maduro runs counter to the principle of peaceful dispute resolution and runs counter to the principle of non-use of force. The proliferation of violations of the United Nations Charter and international law by States vested with the responsibility of permanent members of this Council undermines the very foundations of the international order…The transition which is currently being opened up for Venezuela needs to be peaceful and democratic and carried out in a manner which respects the choice of the Venezuelan people, a sovereign people. This transition must be led by and for the Venezuelans. France stands ready, alongside states in the region and partners of the European Union to uphold dialogue with a view to the restoration of the free democratic expression in Venezuela to support regional stability.
Bahrain, Delivered by Jamal Fares Al-Ruwaie, permanent representative of the Kingdom of Bahrain to the United Nations (01:33:34)
The Kingdom of Bahrain reaffirms our support for regional and international efforts to achieve a political, lasting solution in the Bolivarian republic of Venezuela that needs to be achieved through regional cooperation and with respect for national sovereignty.
Pakistan, Delivered by Usman Jadoon, acting permanent representative of Pakistan to the United Nations (01:36:26)
See also: Statement by Ambassador Usman Jadoon
The UN Charter enjoins us to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. The UN Charter also binds member states to sovereign equality. Unilateral military action contravenes…the doctrine of sovereign integrity. Such actions set dangerous precedents that risk eroding the foundations of the global legal field. We also feel instability, which, as history has shown time and again, can lead to unpredictable and uncontrollable outcomes for years to come.
Greece, Delivered by Ioannis Stamatekos, deputy permanent representative of Greece to the United Nations (01:39:50)
See also: Greece’s statement at the Security Council meeting on “Threats to International Peace and Security”
We urge all actors to exercise maximum restraint and to refrain from actions that would deepen the crisis and undermine prospects for peace and stability. Greece reiterates that the Charter of the United Nations and international law, including human rights law, must always be respected. We also report the obligation of all parties to protect civilians, especially in times of heightened tensions…We have long been clear that Nicolás Maduro’s, an illegitimate president, claim to power lacks legitimacy.
Venezuela, Delivered by Samuel R. Moncada, permanent representative of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the United Nations (01:43:03)
The events of January 3 constitute a flagrant violation of the UN Charter perpetrated by the U.S. government, in particular, the principal violation of the principle of sovereign equality of states, of the absolute prohibition of the use or threat of use of force against the territorial integrity of political independence as enshrined in Article II, paragraph four and a violation of the duty to settle disputes by peaceful means. Similarly, these acts also seriously violate the Geneva Conventions and its protocols as indiscriminate attacks were carried out against the civilian population and assets. International human rights law has also been violated, particularly the right to life, personal integrity, and security. Of particular seriousness is the kidnapping of the president of the Republic by the government of the United States of America, which constitutes a direct violation of an essential norm of the international legal order…the personal immunity of heads of state in office. This immunity is not an individual privilege. It is an institutional guarantee that protects the sovereignty of states and the stability of the international system. Its disregard not only affects Venezuela but also sets an extremely dangerous precedent for all states represented in this chamber, regardless of their size, power or alliances… Venezuela urges this Security Council to fully assume its responsibility and to act in accordance with the mandate conferred upon it by the Charter of the United Nations. In that regard, we request that the government of the United States of America be demanded to fully respect the immunities of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, as well as their immediate release and safe return to Venezuela. Two, that the use of force against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela be clearly and unequivocally condemned. Thirdly, that the principle of non acquisition of territory or resources by force be reaffirmed. And four, that measures aimed at de-escalation, the protection of the civilian population and the restoration of international law be adopted.
Argentina, Delivered by Francisco Fabián Tropepi, permanent representative of Argentina to the United Nations (01:53:02)
The government of the Argentine Republic values the decision and determination demonstrated by the President of the United States of America and by his government in the recent actions taken in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of the dictator Nicolás Maduro.
Chile, Delivered by Paula Narvaez Ojeda, ambassador and permanent representative of Chile to the United Nations (01:58:20)
Chile would like to express our deep concern and firm condemnation of the unilateral military action taken by the United States on the territory of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela…Chile does not recognize the Maduro regime, but serious violations of human rights being faced by Venezuela do not have a military solution.
Brazil, Delivered by Sérgio Danese, permanent representative of the Federative Republic of Brazil to the United Nations (02:03:36)
Brazil categorically and firmly rejects the armed intervention in Venezuelan territory in flagrant violation of the Charter of the United Nations and international law…These acts constitute a very serious affront to the sovereignty of Venezuela and set an extremely dangerous precedent for the entire international community…For the first time in South America, a profoundly alarming event has occurred, an external armed aggression, with the deployment of troops and bombings in a neighboring country, contiguous with Brazil, with which we share more than 2000 kilometers of border, Mr. President, South America is a zone of peace. I insist upon that we have upheld and will uphold with full determination peace and non intervention in our region
Mexico, Delivered by Héctor Vasconcelos, permanent representative of Mexico to the United Nations (02:09:09)
The government of Mexico has already made its position clear, with regard to our condemnation of the military aggression of January 3 against targets in the territory of Venezuela in clear violation of Article II of the Charter of the United Nations, these actions must not be allowed, as they constitute a severe blow to the charter and to multilateralism.
Paraguay, Delivered by Marcelo Eliseo Scappini Ricciardi, permanent representative of the Permanent Mission of Paraguay to the United Nations (02:14:43)
The delegation of Paraguay…has already pointed out the situation with regard to Venezuela under President Maduro and the Cartel de los Soles and the criminal organization that was formally declared as such by our national authorities. His continued presence was a threat to the region. The exit of the leader of that terrorist organization should immediately lead to the restoration of democracy and to the rule of law in Venezuela, making it possible that the popular will expressed at the ballot box will be the foundation for reconstruction in Venezuela.
Cuba, Delivered by Ernesto Soberón Guzmán, permanent representative of Cuba to the United Nations (02:16:59)
Cuba aligns itself with the statement…on behalf of the non-aligned movement… Cuba condemns in the strongest terms the military aggression of the United States against Venezuela while categorically reiterating its absolute support and solidarity with the Venezuelan people and joins the demand that the government of the United States release the constitutional president, Nicolás Maduro and his companion, Celia Flores, in the criminal attack perpetrated by the United States. 32 Cubans lost their lives in combat actions.
Nicaragua, Delivered by Jaime Hermida, permanent representative of Nicaragua to the United Nations (02:23:43)
See also: Address by Nicaragua in the Meeting on Venezuela of the Security Council
Nicaragua supports what was expressed by the Interim President of Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, calling for the immediate release of the constitutional and legitimate president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, and the first lady of the country, Cilia Flores. All member states of the United Nations have the duty to respect international law, the spirit, the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter, the rights to sovereignty, self determination, territorial integrity of states, non-interference and peaceful coexistence. The Venezuelan people are a dignified people…Nicaragua will always stand with Venezuela.
Trinidad and Tobago, Delivered by Neil Parsan, permanent representative of The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago to the United Nations (02:26:13)
See also: Statement delivered by Ambassador Dr. Neil Parsan
My delegation addresses this Council today as a Caribbean nation, a neighbor of Venezuela, and a long standing advocate for peaceful coexistence and the rule of law. The government of Trinidad and Tobago has taken note of the military operations undertaken by the United States in Venezuela. We remain committed to cooperative efforts led by the United States to disrupt and dismantle networks that enable transnational crime across the Americas, whose activities have had debilitating effects on the security and stability of the region. Trinidad and Tobago remain steadfast in support of the United States of America initiatives that strengthen regional security, reinforce the rule of law, and safeguard the well being of our societies. The government of Trinidad and Tobago, while valuing its long standing and robust partnership with the United States remains equally committed to maintaining a constructive and respectful relationship with the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, and continues to uphold peaceful relations with the people of Venezuela. The delegation of Trinidad and Tobago wishes to underscore its long standing relationship with both the United States and Venezuela, and stands ready to work collaboratively, collaboratively with all partners who share the aspiration of a safer, more prosperous and stable hemisphere.
Spain, Delivered by Héctor Gómez Hernández, permanent representative of Spain to the United Nations (02:28:37)
Spain would like to express our profound concern about what’s happened in Venezuela, and as the Secretary General of the United Nations has noted, it constitutes a very worrying precedent with implications for the region and for the world. Respect for the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, particularly the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states and the prohibition of the use or the threat of use of force, is indispensable to ensure international coexistence. We considered that these actions constitute a very troubling precedent for regional peace and security, and we recall that the natural resources of a country are part of its sovereignty. We share the view that the fight against organized crime in the region is a priority, but that fight can only be waged through international cooperation.
South Africa, Delivered by Jonathan Passmoor, acting deputy permanent representative of the Republic of South Africa to the United Nations (02:31:25)
The unilateral military strikes carried out by the United States of America against Venezuela and the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and his spouse from Venezuelan territory for transfer to the United States wantonly violates the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Venezuela. These actions are also in stark contrast of our established legal norms…South Africa stresses that allegations of internal governance challenges, human rights concerns or acts of criminality by a Head of State cannot justify a breach of the Charter’s prohibition on the use of force particularly Article 2(4) of the Charter…Additionally, under international law, a State has exclusive jurisdiction over persons and conduct within its own territory. Any enforcement of domestic law, including arrest, by one State within the territory of another State without that State’s consent is an unlawful violation of sovereignty.
Eritrea, Sophia Tesfamariam Yohannes, permanent representative of Eritrea to the United Nations (02:38:08)
I read this statement on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defense of the United Nations Charter. The Group of Friends in Defense of the United Nations Charter condemns in the most unequivocal and categorical manner, the act of aggression perpetrated on third January 2026 against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela by special forces of the United States of America, which included…the illegal abduction of the president and first lady.
Iran, Delivered by Amir Saeid Iravani, permanent representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations (02:43:14)
See also: Statement by H.E. Mr. Amir Saeid Iravani
The Islamic Republic of Iran condemns, in the strongest possible terms, the military attack carried out by the United States of America against the Bolivarian republic of Venezuela.
Uganda, Delivered by Adonia Ayebare, permanent representative of Uganda to the United Nations, on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement (02:49:07)
The Coordinating Bureau of the Non-Aligned Movement 121 member States categorically condemns the act of aggression perpetrated by the United States…against…Venezuela…which included armed attacks against civilian and military locations…The Coordinating Bureau of the Non-Aligned Movement notes that the attacks in question, which blatantly violate the purposes and the principles enshrined in the charter of the United Nations, as well as the norms of the international law, constitute an act of war against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela that undermines both regional and international peace, security and stability, while also threatening the very right to life of the Venezuelan people. The Coordinating Bureau of the Non-Aligned Movement demands the immediate cessation of all hostilities against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the full respect of the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence and inalienable rights to the self determination of Bolivian republic of Venezuela, and that those responsible for those ongoing acts of aggression to be held accountable.
The post U.S. Allies and Adversaries’ Reactions to Operation Absolute Resolve to Capture Maduro appeared first on Just Security.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...