Defense News and Headlines
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests

Defense Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Sunday recap

NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts
DefenseNewsAutonomy, Anxiety, and the Twilight of Transatlantic Order
Autonomy, Anxiety, and the Twilight of Transatlantic Order
Defense

Autonomy, Anxiety, and the Twilight of Transatlantic Order

•February 16, 2026
0
RealClearWorld – Security/Defense (alt aggregation)
RealClearWorld – Security/Defense (alt aggregation)•Feb 16, 2026

Why It Matters

A weakening transatlantic bond could disrupt coordinated responses to security threats and affect global markets, making renewed cooperation essential for stability.

Key Takeaways

  • •Munich Security Conference highlighted transatlantic tensions
  • •EU seeks greater strategic autonomy from US
  • •US shows anxiety over shifting alliance dynamics
  • •Russia-China cooperation fuels Western uncertainty
  • •Leaders call for renewed diplomatic engagement

Pulse Analysis

The Munich Security Conference has long served as a barometer for the health of the transatlantic partnership, bringing together NATO members, EU officials, and U.S. policymakers under one roof. This year’s gathering, however, felt markedly different: the tone was more urgent, and the backdrop of Russian aggression in Ukraine and China’s expanding influence amplified concerns about the durability of the post‑Cold‑War order. Attendees noted that the traditional “Washington‑Berlin” axis is being tested by divergent threat assessments and competing domestic priorities, prompting a reassessment of shared strategic assumptions.

European ministers used the forum to press for greater strategic autonomy, arguing that reliance on U.S. security guarantees has become increasingly unpredictable. The United States, meanwhile, displayed a palpable anxiety about losing influence, especially as Washington grapples with domestic political divisions and a shifting focus toward the Indo‑Pacific. This push‑pull dynamic is reshaping NATO’s internal debates, with calls for Europe to develop independent defense capabilities while still maintaining a collective deterrence posture. The resulting friction highlights the delicate balance between sovereignty and alliance cohesion.

From a business perspective, a fragmented transatlantic order introduces uncertainty for multinational corporations that rely on predictable regulatory environments and coordinated sanctions regimes. Companies in defense, energy, and technology sectors are watching closely for policy signals that could affect supply chains, export controls, and investment flows. Moreover, investors are recalibrating risk models to account for potential gaps in collective security that could destabilize markets. The conference’s emphasis on dialogue suggests that, despite current tensions, there remains a strong incentive for policymakers to rebuild trust and preserve the economic benefits of a united Atlantic partnership.

Autonomy, Anxiety, and the Twilight of Transatlantic Order

Munich was warmer than Washington this weekend, both in weather and in sentiment. Neither development was widely forecast. The sense of crisis in transatlantic relations was plain, especially on the European side, and the world descended on the Bayerischer Hof hotel to sort it all out. At the Munich Security Conference there was beer to drink, brats to eat, statements to make, and bilateral meetings to hold. February’s foreign policy freneticism kicked off in earnest.

Read Original Article
0

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...