An outdated C2 network hampers battlefield agility and increases risk, threatening the Army’s ability to win future conflicts. Modernizing the network is a strategic imperative for national security and defense industry growth.
The Army’s command and control (C2) infrastructure has become a patchwork of legacy platforms, each added to address immediate needs without a long‑term vision. This incremental approach, common across many large institutions, results in fragmented data flows, redundant hardware, and a steep learning curve for operators. As adversaries invest heavily in networked warfare and artificial intelligence, the U.S. Army’s reliance on outdated communication pathways risks eroding its decision‑making speed and situational awareness.
A purpose‑built C2 architecture would consolidate disparate systems into a unified, secure network that delivers real‑time intelligence to commanders on the ground. By leveraging cloud‑native services, edge computing, and standardized data models, the Army can reduce latency, improve resilience against cyber attacks, and enable seamless integration of emerging technologies such as autonomous platforms and predictive analytics. This transformation aligns with the Department of Defense’s Joint All‑Domain Command and Control (JADC2) initiative, which seeks interoperable networks across services and allies.
Funding and policy reforms are already underway, but successful implementation hinges on disciplined acquisition processes and close collaboration with industry partners. The shift from incremental upgrades to a holistic redesign promises not only operational superiority but also cost efficiencies through reduced maintenance of obsolete hardware. For defense contractors, this creates a lucrative market for next‑generation networking solutions, while for policymakers it underscores the strategic necessity of investing in a resilient, future‑proof C2 ecosystem.
Mingus, Marcelin & Daker, MWI
The current state of Army command and control (C2) reflects decades of incremental additions rather than deliberate design.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...