Q&A: ‘If You Are in the Business of Peace, You Must Talk to Those Who Are at War’

Why It Matters

His candidacy could reshape UN diplomacy by prioritizing direct engagement in hot‑button conflicts and accelerating nuclear‑energy policies that address both security and climate goals.

Key Takeaways

• Grossi nominated by Argentina to become UN secretary‑general for 2027‑31 term
• He negotiated six cease‑fire agreements at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant
• Grossi warns proliferation could raise nuclear‑armed states from 10 to over 30
• Advocates nuclear power as baseload energy security, complementing renewables
• Calls for a more active UN secretary‑general to mediate global conflicts

Pulse Analysis

Rafael Grossi’s nomination marks a rare convergence of nuclear expertise and high‑level diplomacy. Having steered the IAEA through the fallout of the JCPOA collapse, the Ukraine‑Russia nuclear standoff, and persistent Iranian inspections, Grossi brings a hands‑on approach that contrasts sharply with the traditionally ceremonial role of the UN secretary‑general. His track record of direct talks with Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelensky and Tehran’s officials underscores a belief that personal engagement, not public condemnation, is the most effective lever for de‑escalation. This pragmatic style could redefine how the UN intervenes in protracted crises, from Gaza to the Sahel, by positioning the secretary‑general as an on‑the‑ground negotiator rather than a distant spokesperson.

Beyond conflict mediation, Grossi’s vision ties nuclear energy to global energy security and climate objectives. He argues that the recent war‑driven volatility has revived interest in baseload power sources, prompting Central and Eastern European nations to double down on new reactors. In his view, renewables alone cannot guarantee grid stability; a diversified mix that includes advanced reactors and small modular designs can reduce reliance on imported gas while delivering low‑carbon electricity. This stance resonates with policymakers seeking tangible pathways to the 1.5 °C target, especially as supply‑chain disruptions make a rapid coal phase‑out impractical for economies like India’s.

If elected, Grossi is likely to push for structural reforms within the UN system, streamlining overlapping climate bodies and fostering stronger coordination with the World Bank and multilateral development banks. He also sees a role for emerging technologies, hosting AI‑nuclear forums that bring together firms such as Google, Meta and OpenAI to shape responsible policy on autonomous weapons. By marrying nuclear diplomacy with climate pragmatism and tech governance, Grossi’s potential leadership could steer the UN toward a more proactive, interdisciplinary posture in an era marked by proliferation anxieties and escalating geopolitical tensions.