The Epidemic of GPS Jamming

The Epidemic of GPS Jamming

Foreign Policy
Foreign PolicyJun 1, 2026

Companies Mentioned

Why It Matters

The interference threatens safety, operational efficiency, and time‑critical data across aviation and maritime sectors, forcing a costly shift back to manual navigation methods. It also underscores a new frontier in electronic warfare that could reshape global logistics and security policies.

Key Takeaways

  • 123,000 flights disrupted by GPS interference in early 2025.
  • Russia expanded GPS spoofing antennas from 3 to 36 since 2025.
  • ICAO identified Russia and North Korea as primary GPS jamming perpetrators.
  • Airlines and ships now rely on manual navigation and low‑orbit satellites.
  • EU action plan and insurers offer alternative signals to mitigate risk.

Pulse Analysis

The surge in GPS jamming and spoofing reflects a broader shift toward electronic warfare as a strategic tool. Recent data shows that more than a hundred thousand flights in the first four months of 2025 experienced navigation anomalies, while major shipping lanes in the Baltic, Red Sea, and Gulf of Oman report frequent signal loss or distortion. State actors such as Russia have dramatically scaled their capabilities, expanding from three to thirty‑six GNSS‑interference antennas, and North Korea has been similarly implicated. These developments erode the reliability of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), which underpins modern air traffic control, maritime routing, and time‑sensitive logistics.

For airlines and vessel operators, the operational fallout is immediate and costly. Pilots must revert to inertial navigation or celestial techniques, increasing workload and the potential for human error. Ground crews lose precise position data, complicating scheduling, fuel planning, and insurance verification that depend on accurate timestamps. The risk of accidents rises, as illustrated by the grounding of the container ship Antonia off Jeddah in 2025 after GPS disruption. Consequently, industry players are diversifying navigation sources, integrating low‑orbit satellite constellations that are harder to jam, and revising crew training to include non‑satellite navigation skills.

Regulators are moving to mitigate the threat. The International Civil Aviation Organization has formally condemned the interference and identified the key perpetrators, while the European Union unveiled an action plan outlining procedures for pilots and air traffic controllers during GNSS outages. Norway is expanding monitoring stations, and insurers like DNK are offering members access to resilient satellite signals. These coordinated responses aim to preserve the safety and efficiency of global transport networks, but the underlying geopolitical contest over the electromagnetic spectrum suggests that GPS jamming will remain a persistent challenge for the foreseeable future.

The Epidemic of GPS Jamming

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...