Why It Matters
China’s acceleration in space threatens U.S. national security by eroding the strategic advantage that space has long provided to the military, making it a critical issue for policymakers and the public. Understanding this challenge is essential for ensuring adequate funding, policy reforms, and innovation in the Space Force to protect vital communications, navigation, and surveillance capabilities.
Key Takeaways
- •Bipartisan commission warns rapid Chinese space militarization.
- •China's launches grew from 19 (2015) to over 90 (2025).
- •China treats space as warfighting domain with ASAT, lasers.
- •US must reallocate funding, boost counter‑space capabilities urgently.
- •Immersive wargaming helps Congress visualize Chinese space threat.
Pulse Analysis
The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s 2025 report, unanimously approved by twelve bipartisan commissioners, spotlights an accelerating Chinese space program. Launch cadence has exploded—from just 19 orbital missions in 2015 to more than 90 in 2025, and over 1,000 satellites deployed in the last decade. This surge, coupled with demonstrated anti‑satellite tests, directed‑energy lasers, and sophisticated jamming, signals that China now treats space as a warfighting domain, reshaping the strategic calculus for Washington and its allies.
For the U.S. military, the implications are concrete. A carrier battle group that once crossed the Pacific under intermittent Chinese observation now faces persistent tracking, enabling real‑time targeting data for potential strikes. The Space Force and joint forces must confront this reality by reallocating existing defense budgets, enhancing counter‑space capabilities, and embracing a “good‑enough” rapid‑acquisition model exemplified by commercial players like SpaceX. Policymakers are urged to debate whether additional funding is required and how best to balance exquisite, long‑life satellites against swarms of cheaper, replaceable platforms.
To translate technical threat assessments into actionable congressional support, the National Space Power Center leverages immersive simulations, strategic wargaming, and visual storytelling. These tools help senior leaders and lawmakers see the speed and direction of China’s space ambitions, making the abstract threat tangible. By fostering bipartisan consensus and delivering clear, data‑driven narratives, the commission aims to secure the resources needed for U.S. space dominance and robust counter‑space operations, ensuring the nation retains its strategic edge in the evolving space warfighting arena.
Episode Description
What happens to the American economy, not just the American military, if China wins the space race?
In this episode of the Spacepower Podcast, SFA Founder and host Bill Woolf sits down with Randy Schriver, Chair of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, and Mike Kuiken, its Vice Chair, joined by co-host Dillon "Brick" Cox, Chair of SFA's National Spacepower Center Committee. Together they work through one of the most important questions in national security that most Americans aren't asking: what does contested space actually cost us?
The Commission's 2025 Annual Report to Congress was approved unanimously by all twelve commissioners, six Republicans, six Democrats. In a Washington where almost nothing gets bipartisan agreement, that consensus is the story.
Randy Schriver served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs. He describes returning to government, getting his clearances back, and walking into his first briefing: "My mind exploded." General Saltzman called China's space advancement "mind-boggling." That's not a phrase you hear from a four-star general.
Mike Kuiken spent nearly 23 years in the U.S. Senate, over a decade on the Armed Services Committee and then as Senate Majority Leader Schumer's National Security Advisor. He led the legislative strategy to pass the CHIPS Act.
In this conversation, Randy, Mike, and Brick discuss:
Why China's space advancement exceeded even experienced Pentagon officials' expectations
The carrier battle group problem: how China went from intermittent tracking to persistent targeting of U.S. forces transiting the Pacific
What breaks first for ordinary Americans: GPS, telecommunications, financial timing, the power grid
Why China's military-civil fusion means there is no such thing as a Chinese civilian space program
The CHIPS Act parallel: are we making the same mistake in space that we made in semiconductors?
Why the Space Force has a visibility problem no other service faces, and why that makes building legislative support nearly impossible
What it would take to make a Fortune 500 CEO truly understand 48 hours without GPS
The one thing Randy and Mike would tell a lawmaker who wants to do the right thing but doesn't know where to start
Hosted by Bill Woolf Co-hosted by Dillon "Brick" Cox Produced by Ty Holliday
Randy Schriver, Chair, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Previously served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs.
Mike Kuiken, Vice Chair, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Nearly 23 years in the U.S. Senate, including over a decade on the Armed Services Committee and as Senate Majority Leader Schumer's National Security Advisor. Led the legislative strategy to pass the CHIPS and Science Act.
Read the 2025 Annual Report to Congress: https://www.uscc.gov/annual-report/2025-annual-report-congress
Learn more about SFA's National Spacepower Center: https://ussfa.org/national-space-center/
Learn more about the U.S. Space Force: https://www.spaceforce.mil/
Join SFA: https://ussfa.org/
Subscribe for more conversations on spacepower, national security, and the future of the space domain.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...