Mostly Economics Podcast #34: Another Lie, Another War with Matt Duss

Why It Matters

If true, Duss’s account suggests the war was premised on misleading claims about a nuclear threat, highlighting the risks of intelligence politicization and the strategic consequences of abandoning diplomatic agreements like the JCPOA. That dynamic has major implications for U.S. foreign policy, regional stability, and nonproliferation efforts.

Summary

Former Bernie Sanders adviser Matt Duss tells the Mostly Economics podcast that claims Iran was on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon were false, citing the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate and subsequent U.S. assessments that Tehran had not decided to pursue a bomb. He argues the 2015 JCPOA was the most intrusive nonproliferation deal ever negotiated and that Donald Trump’s withdrawal from it prompted Iran to resume higher-level enrichment. Duss contends hawks in Washington and Israeli leaders opposed the deal for political reasons and have used exaggerated nuclear claims to justify escalating confrontation and push for regime-change policies. He frames the current conflict as driven by bad intelligence narratives and geopolitical agendas rather than an imminent Iranian nuclear threat.

Original Description

Today's episode is about the US-Israel war on Iran, its legitimacy and the economic impacts on people in the US. Our guest, Matt Duss, is the Executive VP at the Center for International Policy, former foreign policy advisor to Senator Bernie Sanders, and co-host of Undiplomatic Podcast.

Matt debunks myths about Iran's nuclear ambitions and Middle East conflicts. This discussion challenges mainstream narratives and unpacks the lies that's gotten the US into yet another war.

--

Follow Dean Baker

https://x.com/DeanBaker13

https://bsky.app/profile/deanbaker13.bsky.social

Follow Mass Duss

https://x.com/mattduss

https://bsky.app/profile/mattduss.bsky.social

Follow Undiplomatic Podcast

https://x.com/UnDiplomaticPod