Reassessing the Strategic Value of China to Korea

Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)
Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)May 13, 2026

Why It Matters

For investors and policymakers, the re‑orientation of Korea’s economic and security ties signals both new market risks and opportunities as Seoul pivots toward the U.S. while remaining dependent on Chinese resources.

Key Takeaways

  • South Korea shifting investment from China to the United States.
  • Economic ties now competition, not complementarity, across tech sectors.
  • Chinese trade coercion (THAAD, Urea) reshapes Seoul’s strategic calculus.
  • Beijing remains reluctant to curb North Korea, limiting security cooperation.
  • Seoul balances deeper U.S. defense ties with essential China‑dependent resources.

Summary

The CSIS panel titled “Reassessing the Strategic Value of China to Korea” brought together senior scholars and former officials to examine how Seoul’s relationship with Beijing has evolved as President Trump prepares a summit with Xi Jinping.

Panelists noted that the old binary of “China as market, U.S. as security guarantor” no longer fits. Over the past two decades Korean investment has moved from China to the United States, supply chains are being de‑centralised, and sectors such as semiconductors, shipbuilding and high‑value electronics now pit Seoul against Beijing rather than complement it. Episodes of Chinese economic coercion – notably the 2016 THAAD retaliation and recent Urea restrictions – underscore the shift from partnership to rivalry.

As Professor Lee recalled, the 1992 normalization promised “limitless opportunities” and even a strategic role in Korean unification, but today China is “aggressively unhelpful” on North Korea and opposes Korean unification. Mark Lambert cited the 50‑plus nuclear weapons North Korea now possesses as evidence of Beijing’s limited leverage. Yet Korean firms continue joint projects, from Hyundai’s hydrogen fuel‑cell plant in Guangzhou to AI and semiconductor collaborations, highlighting lingering interdependence.

The discussion concluded that Seoul must walk a tightrope: deepen defense cooperation with Washington – including AUKUS‑type technology sharing and nuclear‑submarine propulsion – while preserving essential Chinese supplies of minerals and energy. The balance will shape South Korea’s trade diversification, its role in any Taiwan contingency, and the broader U.S.–China strategic competition.

Original Description

With new administrations in Washington and Seoul, and discussion of finding a common approach to China, it is time for a bottom-up evaluation of China's strategic value to South Korea. South Korea cannot properly respond to U.S. policies toward China without a serious and comprehensive reevaluation of its relationship with its neighbor.
For decades, Seoul has navigated a careful balance: a security alliance with the United States, a deep economic relationship with China, and a shared interest with both in managing North Korea. That balance is under strain. U.S.–China competition has hardened. Beijing's leverage over Pyongyang has not delivered the restraint Seoul once hoped for. And Taiwan looms as a contingency that could force choices South Korea has long preferred to defer.
This conference brings together leading experts to examine three questions at the center of that debate:
- What is China's strategic value to South Korea?
- What should Korea's role be in a Taiwan conflict?
- Has China been helpful on North Korea?
This event is co-hosted by CSIS and the Korea Foundation.
#china #korea #xijinping #leejaemyung #northkorea
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit https://www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: https://cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...