Timothy Snyder on How the U.S. Is Committing ‘Superpower Suicide’

Why It Matters

Snyder’s warning highlights that deliberate policy erosion could diminish U.S. geopolitical leverage, reshaping global power dynamics and threatening the liberal international order.

Key Takeaways

• U.S. deliberately weakening its global power through policy choices.
• Structural shifts in wealth and technology exacerbate American decline.
• Cuts in education and research erode long‑term strategic advantage.
• Military and economic strategies are increasingly short‑term and self‑limiting.
• Moral considerations are sidelined, accelerating the superpower’s self‑destruction.

Summary

Timothy Snyder argues the United States is actively engineering its own decline, labeling it “superpower suicide.” He contends that beyond inevitable structural shifts—global wealth redistribution and rapid technological change—the U.S. is making conscious policy choices that diminish its power.

Snyder points to systematic cuts across education, research, defense, and economic policy, describing a pattern of short‑term, ethically compromised decisions that “cut our own Achilles’ heel.” He emphasizes that these choices erode the nation’s strategic depth and long‑term competitiveness.

He illustrates his argument with vivid language, noting that the country is “cutting its own hamstrings” in every domain, from universities to the battlefield. By sidelining moral considerations, the U.S. sacrifices the very foundations of its global leadership.

The warning signals a potential reshaping of the international order. If unaddressed, America’s self‑inflicted weakening could cede influence to rivals and undermine the liberal democratic model that underpins much of the post‑World War‑II system.

Original Description

“We’re in a moment of superpower suicide,” says CFR democracy expert Timothy Snyder. “We are choosing to be far less powerful than we could be. We are choosing that, right? And that’s the element of choice in a suicide. And then there’s the substance of what we’re doing, which is that in domain after domain—long term, short term, ethical, strategic—we are cutting ourselves off. . . . We’re doing it in education. We’re doing it in research. We’re doing it in the way we’re fighting war. We’re doing it in economics.”

Subscribe to our channel: https://goo.gl/WCYsH7

This work represents the views and opinions solely of the author. The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher, and takes no institutional positions on matters of policy.

Visit the CFR website: http://www.cfr.org

Follow CFR on X: http://www.twitter.com/cfr_org

Follow CFR on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations/