Limited Risk Disclosure Updates Despite Political and Economic Volatility

Limited Risk Disclosure Updates Despite Political and Economic Volatility

Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate GovernanceFeb 12, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • 75% of S&P 500 firms didn't update quarterly risk factors
  • Average disclosure length now 14.3 pages, still growing
  • Trade policy dominates new risk-factor updates
  • General risk heading used by one‑third of firms
  • SEC urges specific, non‑boilerplate language

Pulse Analysis

The SEC’s 2020 risk‑reporting reforms intended to curb the growing volume of risk‑factor disclosures, yet Deloitte and the USC Marshall Institute’s latest five‑year study shows the opposite. Over the past year, the average S&P 500 filing expanded to 14.3 pages and 32 distinct risk factors, with more than half of the companies adding content despite guidance to streamline. This trend reflects a broader macro environment—rising geopolitical tension, volatile trade policies, and heightened sustainability scrutiny—that compels firms to disclose an ever‑wider array of potential threats.

Quarterly filings provide a critical checkpoint for material changes, but the data reveal a stark compliance gap. Only 94 companies—roughly one‑quarter of the sample—updated their risk‑factor sections after the April 2, 2025 deadline. Among those, the majority focused on trade‑policy shifts, government contracting, and sustainability reporting, underscoring where investors perceive the most immediate risk. The remaining 333 firms either asserted no material changes or omitted a dedicated risk‑factor section, raising questions about the effectiveness of the SEC’s update requirement and the consistency of risk communication across the market.

For practitioners, the findings translate into actionable priorities. Aligning external disclosures with internal ERM frameworks can streamline updates and ensure specificity, reducing reliance on boilerplate language. Leveraging a clear risk taxonomy improves heading relevance and readability, while adopting plain‑English sentence limits enhances investor comprehension. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, firms that proactively refine their risk narratives will not only meet compliance expectations but also strengthen stakeholder confidence in an increasingly uncertain economic landscape.

Limited Risk Disclosure Updates Despite Political and Economic Volatility

Comments

Want to join the conversation?