EU Parliament Delays Mercosur Trade Deal
•February 3, 2026
0
Why It Matters
Delaying the deal stalls a major market‑opening that could boost EU exporters while heightening agricultural and climate tensions across Europe and South America.
Key Takeaways
- •EU Parliament referred deal to Court of Justice.
- •Tariffs removal covers 91% of goods between EU and Mercosur.
- •Delay could cost EU exporters €4 billion annually.
- •Farmers fear competition; environmental concerns cited.
- •Approval requires ratification by five Mercosur legislatures.
Pulse Analysis
The EU‑Mercosur free‑trade agreement represents one of the most ambitious market‑access pacts in recent decades, linking the world’s largest single market with a bloc of South American economies. By slashing tariffs on nearly all goods, the deal promises to unlock new supply‑chain opportunities for European automakers, vintners, and dairy producers, while granting Mercosur exporters smoother entry for meat, sugar, and rice. However, the political calculus is far from straightforward; the European Parliament’s decision to seek a judicial ruling reflects deep‑seated concerns over legal consistency, competition policy, and the EU’s climate commitments.
Agricultural stakeholders dominate the opposition, fearing that cheaper South American commodities could erode profit margins for EU farmers. France and Poland have vocalized these worries, framing the debate as a matter of food sovereignty and rural livelihoods. Simultaneously, environmental NGOs warn that increased imports may incentivize deforestation in the Amazon, challenging the EU’s own Paris Agreement goals. The Commission’s reassurance that the agreement contains robust sustainability clauses has done little to quell dissent, underscoring the tension between trade liberalisation and ecological responsibility.
If the Court of Justice ultimately validates the pact, the EU could still face a protracted ratification process in the five Mercosur legislatures, extending the timeline well beyond the projected 18‑24 months. The economic stakes are high: analysts estimate annual gains of €4 billion for EU exporters, yet the political cost could manifest as heightened protectionist sentiment within member states. For businesses, the uncertainty underscores the need for scenario planning, while policymakers must balance growth ambitions against domestic pressures and global climate imperatives.
EU Parliament Delays Mercosur Trade Deal
The EU and South America’s Mercosur bloc agreed to a trade deal last month, after 25 years of on‑again, off‑again negotiations. But the European Parliament has opted to wait on giving the final go‑ahead.
By a 334‑324 vote, the lawmakers asked the EU Court of Justice to first rule on the deal’s legality. It also needs to pass the respective assemblies of the five Mercosur states: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.
European Commission (EC) negotiators are not happy. Speaking at a press conference, EC trade spokesman Olof Gill told reporters, “According to our analysis, the questions raised in the motion by the Parliament are not justified, because the commission has already addressed those questions and issues in a very detailed way.”
The agreement signed on January 17 would create a free‑trade zone of some 700 million people, removing 91 % of tariffs on goods between the two regions. EU farmers, however, have protested over concerns that they will be undercut by cheaper South American products and that the Amazon will suffer environmental damage. This despite promises to implement the Paris Agreement on climate change and tackle deforestation.
The wait for a decision by the EU Court means the deal could take another 18 to 24 months to finalize. That could potentially cost EU exporters €4 billion (about $4.8 billion) a year. Automobile, wine, and cheese producers stand to benefit particularly from the deal. Meat, sugar, and rice from the Mercosur countries would find easier access to the European market.
The EU could have approved the deal without first referring it to the Court of Justice, but this would potentially have split Parliament even further.
“The decision of the European Parliament on the Mercosur agreement is regrettable,” German Chancellor Friedrich Merz posted on X. “It misjudges the geopolitical situation. We are convinced of the legality of the agreement. No more delays. The agreement must now be provisionally applied.”
France and Poland, however, have remained steadfastly against the deal.
Said French Foreign Minister Jean‑Noël Barrot, “France takes responsibility for saying no when it is necessary, and often history proves it right. The fight continues to protect our agriculture and ensure our food sovereignty.”
0
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...