
The move toward non‑cash VM reshapes liquidity and risk management, while tri‑party infrastructure could streamline operations and reduce settlement risk across the derivatives market.
Variation margin (VM) has traditionally been posted in cash, a practice that simplifies valuation and settlement for uncleared derivatives. However, rising funding costs, tighter regulatory capital rules and repeated market‑stress episodes have forced banks and asset managers to reassess this approach. Non‑cash assets such as sovereign and investment‑grade corporate bonds can reduce cash outflows and improve balance‑sheet efficiency, but they also introduce valuation and liquidity complexities. As the industry grapples with these trade‑offs, collateral managers are actively exploring alternatives to the cash‑only paradigm.
A recent Risk.net survey of 114 collateral‑management specialists reveals a clear shift. Fifty‑seven percent of sell‑side firms and thirty‑three percent of buy‑side firms report steadily increasing their use of non‑cash VM, with government bonds, high‑grade corporates and supranationals emerging as the preferred instruments. Despite this enthusiasm, respondents cite settlement fails and valuation discrepancies as the primary operational hurdles. The data also highlight a divergence in ambition: sell‑side participants are more aggressive in expanding non‑cash usage, while buy‑side firms remain more cautious.
The growing reliance on non‑cash collateral is driving interest in tri‑party clearing structures, which promise greater scale, transparency and risk control. Approximately one‑quarter of surveyed institutions already employ tri‑party services for both initial margin and VM, and many others are evaluating the model as a way to mitigate settlement risk and streamline margin calls. If tri‑party infrastructure matures, it could accelerate the broader adoption of non‑cash VM, reshaping liquidity management across the derivatives market and influencing regulatory discussions on collateral standards.
Cash has long dominated variation margin (VM) for uncleared derivatives, but that dominance is being tested. Rising funding costs, regulatory pressures and repeated episodes of market stress are prompting financial firms to reconsider how VM is posted – and whether a wider range of securities can play a bigger role.
Drawing on a global survey of 114 collateral management specialists, this Risk.net report examines how attitudes to non‑cash VM are evolving across the sell side and buy side, where ambitions diverge, and why operational complexity continues to slow progress. It also explores the growing interest in tri‑party infrastructure as a potential enabler of scale, efficiency and control in VM collateral management.
Key findings include:
57% of sell‑side and 33% of buy‑side firms say they have steadily increased their use of non‑cash VM.
Government bonds, investment‑grade corporates and supranationals are the most popular forms of non‑cash collateral used by both sets of respondents.
Settlement fails and valuation discrepancies are the main challenges encountered when using non‑cash collateral.
Rising non‑cash usage is boosting interest in tri‑party services, with around one‑quarter of firms already using tri‑party for both initial margin and VM.
The report includes comment from a range of practitioners and is essential reading for heads of collateral management, margining and treasury, as well as risk and post‑trade leaders across buy‑side and sell‑side firms.
Download the report to understand what is shaping the future of VM collateral
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...