OpenAI Pushes Back on Report that Company Missed Revenue Targets

CNBC Television
CNBC TelevisionApr 28, 2026

Why It Matters

The dispute over OpenAI’s growth metrics and IPO timing could shape the valuation of the largest private AI fundraise, influencing how capital flows to the sector and setting a benchmark for future AI IPOs.

Key Takeaways

  • OpenAI denies missing revenue targets, calls report “ridiculous.”
  • CFO emphasizes compute spending driven by revenue growth, not vice versa.
  • $122 billion private fundraising remains largest ever, bolstering liquidity.
  • Internal disagreement rumored over IPO timing, but leadership says no rift.
  • Partnerships with Oracle, Nvidia, AMD underline OpenAI’s ecosystem importance.

Summary

The Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI missed its internal revenue and user‑growth targets, sparking speculation about the company’s financial health and upcoming IPO.

OpenAI’s leadership, represented by CEO Sam Altman and CFO Sarah Friar, dismissed the story as “ridiculous,” stressing that the firm’s compute purchases are a response to strong revenue growth, not a pre‑emptive expense. The company also highlighted its recent $122 billion private fundraising round, the largest ever, which it says funds its compute‑heavy roadmap and underpins partnerships with Oracle, Nvidia, Broadcom and AMD.

Friar framed compute as a strategic moat against rivals like Anthropic, noting that “we look at how the business is growing and then we invest behind it.” Sources also hinted at a possible split between Friar and Altman over IPO timing, though both have publicly denied any internal rift.

If the denial holds, OpenAI’s access to private capital and its ecosystem ties keep it on track for a potential year‑end IPO, but lingering doubts about growth metrics could pressure valuation and investor sentiment as the broader AI market faces regulatory and public‑perception headwinds.

Original Description

CNBC's Kate Rooney reports the latest news regarding OpenAI.

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...