Ultimate Value 1440p OLED Gets Better! - Gigabyte MO27Q28GR Review
Why It Matters
Offering both matte and glossy OLEDs at identical cost gives consumers flexibility and signals manufacturers are responding to user‑driven surface‑finish preferences, potentially shaping future monitor line‑ups.
Key Takeaways
- •Gigabyte now offers glossy version (MO27Q28GR) alongside matte at same price.
- •Glossy coating improves sharpness and black depth, but adds reflections.
- •Brightness about 13% lower on glossy versus matte in SDR/HDR.
- •Both models share identical panel, 280 Hz refresh, input lag, firmware.
- •Gray‑banding persists across units; severity varies, sometimes requiring RMAs.
Summary
The video reviews Gigabyte’s newly released MO27Q28GR, a glossy‑coated 27‑inch 1440p OLED that debuted at CES 2026 and sells for the same $600 price as the matte‑screen MO27Q28G.
Aside from the surface coating, the two monitors are identical – same LG tandem‑W OLED panel, 280 Hz refresh rate, input lag and firmware features such as the HyperNits HDR boost. The glossy finish delivers sharper text and deeper blacks because it does not diffuse the panel’s own light, but it also creates a mirror‑like surface that reflects ambient sources.
Testing showed the glossy unit is roughly 13 % dimmer than the matte model (325 nits vs 368 nits in SDR, 1300 nits vs 1500 nits in HDR) and has slightly worse gamma and ΔE. Both suffer the panel’s inherent gray‑banding, which varies by unit and may require multiple RMAs. Gigabyte markets the coating as “real black glossy,” a term equivalent to ASUS’s “true black glossy.”
For buyers the decision now hinges on lighting conditions and personal preference rather than price, giving consumers a rare choice between matte and glossy OLEDs from the same brand. The review recommends the glossy version for most users who can control ambient light, while noting that the matte model remains brighter in bright rooms.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...