
Context‑aware eDiscovery directly addresses the growing risk of incomplete or inaccurate data collection in cloud‑centric enterprises, making investigations more defensible and cost‑effective.
The explosion of cloud‑based collaboration tools has fundamentally altered how enterprises generate and store information. Email attachments and static files have given way to continuously edited documents, dynamic permission sets, and interlinked data sources. Traditional eDiscovery workflows, built for on‑premise environments, often miss critical metadata, leading to gaps in the evidentiary chain. This shift creates a "Context Gap" where the who, when, and why behind a document become obscured, jeopardizing both compliance and litigation strategies.
Context‑aware eDiscovery seeks to close that gap by integrating temporal identity, behavioral patterns, and document lineage into the collection process. By mapping who accessed or modified a file, when those actions occurred, and how the document evolved across platforms, legal teams can more accurately pinpoint relevant custodians and apply proportionality principles. The approach also enhances defensibility, as courts increasingly expect demonstrable relevance and minimal data overreach. Organizations that adopt these techniques can streamline review, lower costs, and mitigate the risk of sanctions for incomplete or overly broad discovery.
The upcoming ACEDS webinar brings together practitioners from Walgreens, Cloudficient, and KLDiscovery to showcase real‑world applications of context‑aware methods. Their insights illustrate how legal departments can operationalize behavior‑driven analytics, automate lineage tracking, and align discovery practices with modern data architectures. For firms navigating the complexities of cloud migration, the session offers actionable guidance to future‑proof their eDiscovery processes and maintain competitive advantage in an increasingly data‑driven legal landscape.
Context‑Aware eDiscovery: A Modern Approach for Modern Data
ACEDS will host a webinar tomorrow at 1 pm ET (12 pm CT, 10 am PT). In this interactive discussion we’ll explore why traditional eDiscovery tools struggle to keep pace with how work is conducted today and how a context‑aware approach can help legal teams reduce risk, improve defensibility, and regain control over modern data. Drawing on real‑world challenges faced by corporate legal teams, the session will examine how understanding behavior, identity over time, and data lineage changes everything from custodian identification to proportionality decisions.
Topics Include
Why modern collaborative work breaks traditional eDiscovery workflows
Understanding the Context Gap and why context is the new evidence
The importance of temporal identity context, behavioral context, and document context to reconstruct “who knew what and when”
Defining Context‑Aware eDiscovery and illustrating what it looks like in practice
Speakers
Adam Rouse, Director & Sr. Counsel, eDiscovery Operations at Walgreens, Co.
Brandon D’Agostino, Vice President of Product at Cloudficient
Eric Robinson, JD/PMP, Vice President, Global Advisory Services & Strategic Solutions at KLDiscovery
Let’s face it: eDiscovery was built for an on‑premise world of static files and email attachments, but today’s enterprise data lives in collaborative, cloud‑native ecosystems where documents (including hyperlinked files) are continuously edited, permissions shift, teams reorganize, and context quietly disappears. Yet many eDiscovery workflows still rely on assumptions that no longer hold true in today’s modern data world. If you’re struggling with discovery of modern data, register for the webinar to learn how a context‑aware approach is the right modern approach for modern data.
Disclosure: Cloudficient is an Educational partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners, or my clients. eDiscovery Today is provided solely for educational purposes to offer general information about eDiscovery principles and is not a substitute for competent legal advice from a retained lawyer.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...