An Edited Version Of Learning Resources

Summary

In this episode the host discusses his unconventional approach to Supreme Court opinions, focusing on a deep dive into the complex *Learning Resources* case, which produced seven separate opinions spanning over 170 pages. He explains how he edited the opinions—condensing the majority, Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett, Kagan, Jackson, Thomas, and Kavanaugh writings—to create a more digestible 50‑page version for a law supplement, highlighting which sections are essential and which can be omitted. The host also reflects on the implications of the case for the Major Questions Doctrine and the challenges of teaching it within constitutional law curricula.