Sacking Poor Performer After Sick Leave Wasn't Unlawful

Sacking Poor Performer After Sick Leave Wasn't Unlawful

HR Daily (Australia)
HR Daily (Australia)May 12, 2026

Why It Matters

The ruling clarifies that Australian employers may lawfully dismiss employees for bona fide performance reasons despite recent sick leave, limiting the scope of general protections claims. It signals to businesses that thorough performance documentation can protect against unlawful termination allegations.

Key Takeaways

  • Court upheld termination based on performance, not sick leave
  • Manager dismissed after less than three months at resort
  • Performance issues documented weeks after hire
  • General protections claim rejected as pretext
  • Decision clarifies employer rights on performance‑based dismissals

Pulse Analysis

Australian employment law grants workers protection from adverse action, including dismissal for reasons unrelated to performance. However, the General Protections provisions do not shield employees who are terminated for legitimate, documented performance shortcomings. Courts assess the employer’s motive by examining evidence such as performance reviews, warnings, and timing of the termination. In this case, the Federal Circuit Court found a clear paper trail of performance concerns that predated the employee’s sick leave, rendering the dismissal lawful under the Fair Work Act.

The case involved a food and beverage manager at the Darwin FreeSpirit Resort who was hired in July 2023 and terminated in October 2023. Within weeks, supervisors flagged “broad and multifaceted performance and suitability deficiencies,” prompting formal feedback. When the employee returned from personal leave, the resort acted on those pre‑existing concerns, issuing a termination letter that cited performance rather than the leave. The employee’s claim that the dismissal was a pretext for refusing to work while on leave failed because the court was satisfied the employer’s decision was grounded in documented performance issues, not retaliation.

For employers, the judgment reinforces the importance of maintaining detailed performance records and following a consistent disciplinary process. Companies should ensure that any concerns are communicated promptly, documented thoroughly, and addressed before resorting to termination. This approach not only supports operational standards but also provides a robust defence against potential unfair dismissal claims. Legal counsel advises that when performance issues are evident and well‑recorded, employers can act decisively without fearing that recent sick leave will automatically render a dismissal unlawful.

Sacking poor performer after sick leave wasn't unlawful

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...