40 | Choosing Software M&A Counsel: What Founders Should Know Before Their Exit
Why It Matters
Choosing the right M&A lawyer directly influences deal terms, speed, and closure probability, ultimately affecting a founder’s exit valuation and business outcome.
Key Takeaways
- •Start hiring M&A counsel early, alongside investment bank.
- •Choose lawyers with software‑specific, same‑size transaction deal experience.
- •Ensure firm has in‑house tax, IP, employment specialists.
- •Test responsiveness; delays signal risk in fast‑paced transactions.
- •Ask about conflict policies and external resource reliance.
Summary
The podcast episode focuses on how software founders should select M&A counsel when preparing to sell or raise capital, emphasizing timing and differences from corporate counsel.
Hosts discuss that counsel should be engaged early, ideally with the investment bank, and must have deep experience in software‑as‑a‑service (SaaS) or AI deals of comparable size and structure. They stress the need for in‑house tax, IP, and employment experts, noting that buyer side firms typically use national, battle‑hardened teams.
Notable quotes include Mike Greco’s warning that “the buyer’s counsel will not cheap out on lawyers” and the caution that hiring a “local yokel” lacking transaction expertise can derail a deal. They also highlight the importance of responsiveness and conflict‑of‑interest policies.
The implications are clear: the right M&A team can streamline negotiations, protect valuation, and reduce closing risk, while a mis‑matched counsel can extend timelines, increase costs, and jeopardize the transaction’s success.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...