Stalking & Harassment Laws; Beyond Offence and Upset
Why It Matters
Liability for harassment can arise from repeated benign messages, so firms must enforce strict communication controls to mitigate legal risk.
Key Takeaways
- •Criminal threshold depends on threat, not mere offense.
- •Repeated innocuous messages can become stalking under law.
- •Menacing communications require fear of immediate unlawful harm.
- •Offense or upset alone does not satisfy legal test.
- •Complaints trigger investigation but do not define criminality.
Summary
The video clarifies that stalking and harassment statutes hinge on the presence of a credible threat, not merely on a person’s feeling of offense or upset.
It explains that menacing communications—messages that induce fear of immediate unlawful harm—are criminal, and that even otherwise harmless messages can cross into illegal territory when sent repeatedly, creating a pattern of intimidation.
The speaker emphasizes, “Offense is not a legal test,” and notes that filing a complaint does not itself establish criminality; law enforcement must assess whether the conduct meets the statutory threshold of fear and ongoing nuisance.
For businesses and individuals, understanding this distinction is crucial to avoid inadvertent liability and to design communication policies that prevent repeated, unwanted contact from escalating into prosecutable harassment.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...