Who Is Britain Really Saving in the Fight Against Modern Slavery? | LSE Event
Why It Matters
The analysis exposes how repurposing modern‑slavery laws deepens racial inequities, urging policymakers to prioritize survivor‑led, community‑based interventions over militarized policing.
Key Takeaways
- •Modern slavery laws are being repurposed to criminalize drug runners.
- •Black mothers labeled “angry” become key voices in policy critique.
- •County‑lines victims often face homelessness before recruitment.
- •Police strip‑searches disproportionately target Black children, fueling mistrust.
- •Community‑led narratives demand shift from punitive to supportive approaches.
Summary
The LSE event launched a new open‑access volume that interrogates Britain’s claim to be rescuing victims of modern slavery. Panelists—including researcher Insa Fakiti, activist Kojo Cheriawa, and former trafficked youth Glo Wilwa—explored how the state’s anti‑gang agenda has co‑opted modern‑slavery legislation to prosecute low‑level drug runners, often re‑branding them as victims without addressing underlying harms.
Drawing on five years of ethnographic fieldwork across working‑class estates, the authors reveal that police practices—such as strip‑searches that are eight times more likely on Black children—create a climate of fear and alienation. The book documents how mothers labeled “angry” and “overbearing” provide crucial bottom‑up knowledge, while Glo’s personal trajectory from a Congolese immigrant child to a homeless 14‑year‑old recruited into county‑lines illustrates the brutal economics that push youth into exploitation.
Liz Fakiti’s remarks on “white‑saviorist nonsense” and Glo’s vivid recollection of being housed by a recruiter who taught him crack‑cocaine handling underscore the gap between official narratives and lived experience. Their testimonies challenge the notion that policing alone can “save” communities, instead highlighting the need for community‑driven solutions and economic alternatives.
The discussion signals a potential shift in policy discourse: if lawmakers heed survivor voices, modern‑slavery statutes could be redirected toward genuine protection rather than punitive drug enforcement. This reorientation could reduce disproportionate policing, improve trust in law‑enforcement, and foster preventative community investment.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...