Does The Devil Wears Prada 2 Cut Deeper than the Original? | Common Sense Movie Minute
Why It Matters
The sequel’s emphasis on self‑advocacy and authentic communication offers teens relatable role models, making it a valuable, age‑appropriate cultural touchstone for families.
Key Takeaways
- •Sequel adds more heart and stronger personal growth lessons.
- •Andy returns to Runway, displaying increased self‑assurance and advocacy.
- •Film includes mild profanity, implied sex, and brief romantic moments.
- •Themes emphasize second chances, honest communication, and authenticity.
- •Rated suitable for teens 13+, marked Common Sense Selection.
Summary
The Common Sense Media review focuses on the sequel to the 2006 hit *The Devil Wears Prada*, evaluating its content, themes, and suitability for teenage viewers. The video outlines the film’s plot—Andy Sachs returns to Runway magazine—and highlights how the sequel strives to deepen emotional resonance compared with the original.
Key observations note that the sequel introduces more heart, showcasing Andy’s newfound confidence and willingness to advocate for herself. While the movie retains the original’s fashion‑industry satire, it adds lessons about second chances, honest communication, and staying true to oneself. Content warnings include a single F‑bomb used as an exclamation, implied sexual activity, brief kissing, and occasional rude remarks about appearance.
Specific dialogue cited—"You are here to help us through our current scandal" and "I hope that's not what you're wearing to the dinner"—illustrates the blend of workplace drama and personal growth. The review stresses that these elements remain within the comprehension range of teens, earning a 13+ rating and a Common Sense Selection badge.
For parents and educators, the analysis signals that the film can serve as a conversation starter about workplace dynamics, self‑advocacy, and ethical decision‑making, while still meeting age‑appropriate standards for language and thematic content.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...