Mitski Talks About Touring Smaller Venues #Mitski

Why It Matters

Prioritizing intimacy over capacity could reshape touring economics, encouraging artists to favor boutique venues and deeper fan engagement.

Key Takeaways

• Mitski rejects larger arenas in favor of intimate venues
• She believes bigger venues dilute album’s emotional resonance
• Goal: recreate excitement of early‑career, small‑venue shows for fans
• She seeks unique, memorable experiences beyond typical concert settings
• Smaller, unconventional spaces aim to foster deeper artist‑audience connection

Summary

Mitski explains why she is deliberately avoiding arena tours for her latest album, opting instead for smaller, often unconventional venues.

She argues that the prevailing industry mindset equates bigger venues with success, but she feels that larger spaces dilute the emotional impact of her new music. She wants to recapture the intimacy of her early‑career shows, like those from the Puberty 2 tour, and create a sense of discovery for audiences.

“Bigger and bigger venues didn’t feel right for this album’s music,” she says, adding that she wants fans to experience excitement and intimacy they might not get at typical large‑scale concerts. She cites the thrill of performing in places audiences have never visited as a core part of the experience.

This stance challenges conventional touring economics, suggesting that artists can prioritize artistic fit and fan connection over maximum ticket revenue. If other musicians follow suit, the live‑music landscape could see a resurgence of boutique venues and more diversified revenue streams.

Original Description

Mitski talked with host Gannon about the intention behind touring smaller, more intimate venues.

Listen and read to the full interview at thecurrent.org

@mitskileaks #TheCurrent #ArtistInterview