Transportation News and Headlines
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests

Transportation Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Sunday recap

NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts
TransportationNewsSCI, Oil Firms Shipping JV Delayed over Lack of Clarity on ONGC’s Role
SCI, Oil Firms Shipping JV Delayed over Lack of Clarity on ONGC’s Role
EnergyTransportation

SCI, Oil Firms Shipping JV Delayed over Lack of Clarity on ONGC’s Role

•February 28, 2026
0
ET EnergyWorld (The Economic Times)
ET EnergyWorld (The Economic Times)•Feb 28, 2026

Why It Matters

The impasse threatens India’s goal to reduce foreign‑flagged vessel reliance, save foreign exchange, and boost domestic shipbuilding, while exposing major PSUs to limited JV exposure.

Key Takeaways

  • •JV equity split unclear for ONGC
  • •Ship demand halved to 59 vessels
  • •ONGC needs 28 vessels, highest demand
  • •Make in India goals clash with global tenders
  • •JV incorporation delayed pending ONGC decision

Pulse Analysis

The Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) spearheads a joint venture aimed at consolidating ship ownership for the nation’s oil majors, a strategic move to curb dependence on foreign‑flagged vessels and preserve foreign exchange. By pooling resources, the JV intends to channel a significant portion of the 59‑ship fleet—revised down from an earlier 112—through domestic shipyards, aligning with the government’s broader Make‑in‑India agenda. However, the venture’s progress has hit a roadblock as the equity role of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) and its subsidiaries remains unsettled, leaving the JV’s capital structure incomplete.

ONGC’s demand profile dominates the consortium, with 28 vessels required for its offshore operations—more than double the next highest demander, Indian Oil Corporation. The proposed equity split would give SCI a 50% stake, while IOCL, BPCL and Sagarmala Finance would hold the remaining 50% collectively. If ONGC refrains from joining, the JV’s ship acquisition target shrinks to 31 vessels, diluting the strategic impact and reducing the exposure of other PSUs to a negligible level. The lack of clarity on ONGC’s participation also raises questions about the fairness of procurement, as the company has issued global tenders for platform‑supply vessels, contrary to the JV’s domestic‑tender focus.

The controversy underscores a tension between India’s shipbuilding aspirations and market realities. While domestic yards can build many vessel types, they face higher costs and longer lead times due to imported components, prompting ONGC to seek global bids for price discovery. Yet this approach clashes with the government’s push for indigenous manufacturing and could erode confidence in the JV’s ability to deliver on its Make‑in‑India promise. Resolving ONGC’s equity stake and aligning tender strategies will be pivotal for the JV’s incorporation, the nation’s maritime self‑reliance, and the broader push to strengthen India’s shipbuilding ecosystem.

SCI, oil firms shipping JV delayed over lack of clarity on ONGC’s role

Read Original Article
0

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...