I’m 37 and I Used to Think AI Would Make People More Productive – Now I Think It Mostly Exposes How Much of Modern Work Was Never Meaningful to Begin With

I’m 37 and I Used to Think AI Would Make People More Productive – Now I Think It Mostly Exposes How Much of Modern Work Was Never Meaningful to Begin With

Silicon Canals
Silicon CanalsMay 11, 2026

Why It Matters

The insight forces companies to rethink performance metrics and talent development, shifting focus from automatable output to uniquely human judgment and strategic thinking.

Key Takeaways

  • AI instantly produces routine emails, reports, and decks, exposing their low complexity
  • Repetitive deliverables act as “wallpaper,” creating an illusion of productivity
  • Human value shifts to framing questions, judgment, and nuanced communication
  • Careers built on producing filler risk identity loss as AI automates tasks
  • Organizations must redesign metrics to reward insight over output volume

Pulse Analysis

Generative AI entered the market with bold promises of a productivity revolution, promising faster emails, quicker reports, and slide decks built in minutes. Early adopters rushed to integrate tools like ChatGPT and Claude, measuring success by volume of output and time saved. Yet as these models mature, a paradox emerges: the very speed that dazzles managers also strips away the perceived difficulty of many routine tasks, exposing a layer of work that was never intellectually demanding, merely procedural and repeatable.

This revelation has sparked a cultural reckoning inside corporations. Employees who built careers on producing polished decks, meeting minutes, and status briefs now confront an identity crisis when a model can replicate their output in seconds. The work, once a badge of competence, is increasingly seen as "wallpaper"—visual proof of activity without substantive impact. Managers, too, must grapple with the temptation to equate output quantity with performance, risking the erosion of genuine value creation. The shift forces organizations to ask whether their performance metrics reward busywork rather than strategic insight.

Looking ahead, the competitive advantage will hinge on capabilities AI cannot mimic: framing the right problems, exercising nuanced judgment, and fostering authentic human connections. Leaders should invest in training that sharpens critical thinking, ethical decision‑making, and interpersonal skills, while redesigning evaluation systems to prioritize insight over sheer output. By embracing AI as a tool for augmentation rather than replacement, companies can transform the current disruption into an opportunity to elevate the human element of work, ensuring that the remaining tasks are meaningful, measurable, and truly impactful.

I’m 37 and I used to think AI would make people more productive – now I think it mostly exposes how much of modern work was never meaningful to begin with

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...