AI News and Headlines
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests

AI Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Sunday recap

NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts
AINewsNew York’s New Law Forces Advertisers to Say when They’re Using AI Avatars
New York’s New Law Forces Advertisers to Say when They’re Using AI Avatars
AI

New York’s New Law Forces Advertisers to Say when They’re Using AI Avatars

•December 11, 2025
0
The Verge
The Verge•Dec 11, 2025

Companies Mentioned

Getty Images

Getty Images

GETY

Why It Matters

The rules create enforceable transparency for consumers and safeguard performers’ rights, setting a precedent that could ripple nationwide.

Key Takeaways

  • •NY law mandates AI avatar disclosure in ads.
  • •Violations incur $1,000 first fine, $5,000 thereafter.
  • •Deceased likeness use requires heir or executor consent.
  • •Exemptions for expressive works like movies and games.
  • •SAG‑AFTRA backs law to protect actors from AI misuse.

Pulse Analysis

The enactment of New York’s AI‑avatar disclosure law reflects a growing regulatory appetite for clarity in digital advertising. As generative AI tools become cheaper and more sophisticated, brands can now embed synthetic faces that look indistinguishable from real people. By demanding a conspicuous notice, the state seeks to prevent deceptive practices that could erode consumer trust, while also signaling to the market that transparency is a competitive differentiator. This approach aligns with broader global trends, where jurisdictions from the EU to Canada are drafting similar mandates to curb misinformation and protect personal likenesses.

For marketers, the new compliance landscape introduces both operational challenges and strategic opportunities. Agencies must audit creative pipelines, embed disclosure mechanisms, and train copywriters on the legal language required for each campaign. The $1,000‑to‑$5,000 penalty structure, though modest compared to larger litigation risks, creates a financial incentive to adopt automated compliance checks. Notably, the law carves out exemptions for "expressive works" such as movies, TV shows, and video games, allowing studios to continue using AI avatars that mirror on‑screen characters without additional labeling. This nuance preserves artistic freedom while still protecting consumers from misleading commercial content.

Beyond advertising, the legislation touches on the fragmented right‑of‑publicity regime in the United States. By extending consent requirements to the likenesses of deceased individuals, New York fills a gap that many states have left unaddressed in the AI era. The move could pressure other states—and perhaps the federal government—to harmonize standards, especially as industry groups like SAG‑AFTRA rally behind the protections. As AI continues to reshape content creation, the New York model may become a template for balancing innovation with ethical stewardship, influencing how brands, creators, and regulators negotiate the future of synthetic media.

New York’s new law forces advertisers to say when they’re using AI avatars

Read Original Article
0

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...