
Sovereign AI protects citizen data and national security while reducing reliance on foreign cloud providers, reshaping the AI market and regulatory landscape.
The rise of sovereign AI marks a strategic pivot away from the cloud‑centric model that has dominated the past decade. Governments worldwide are demanding that artificial‑intelligence services reside within national boundaries, not only to safeguard personal data but also to retain control over the underlying algorithms. Telecommunications operators, already bound by public‑utility regulations such as the U.S. Customer Proprietary Network Information rules, possess the legal and physical framework to host AI workloads locally. By extending their existing fiber, 5G, and edge‑compute assets, telcos can become the custodians of a nation’s intelligent infrastructure.
Implementing sovereign AI requires redesigning the stack toward compact, memory‑aware models that run at the edge. These models consume less power, enable fast inference, and can be audited because code and weights stay on‑premise. Partnerships with chipmakers like NVIDIA already show up to 40 % energy reductions and notable cost savings versus centralized LLMs. The architecture satisfies strict compliance while delivering performance for critical uses such as public safety and health‑care analytics.
Federal CIOs and regulators now face a choice: continue to rely on foreign‑hosted AI services with opaque data flows, or endorse a sovereign framework built on telco infrastructure. By mandating on‑premise, memory‑driven models, policymakers can embed privacy and auditability into the core of AI deployments, turning personal data into a protected national asset. For telcos, the shift opens a multi‑billion‑dollar revenue stream in AI‑as‑a‑service, but only if they modernize legacy systems and forge ecosystem partnerships. The coming decade will likely see sovereign AI become a cornerstone of digital sovereignty and economic competitiveness.
Will Hurd & Suman Kanuganti · February 16, 2026 2:59 pm
The term “sovereign AI” gets tossed around like a shiny object in AI discourse, invoked by governments, dismissed by skeptics, and misunderstood by most. But what’s often missed is this: Sovereign AI isn’t just about national security. It’s about infrastructure. And the telecommunications companies that already wire the world are best positioned to deliver it.
As governments from Singapore to D.C. scramble to reclaim digital control, this isn’t just about data localization or regulatory fences, but architectural rewiring of power itself. Sovereign AI is a reset in who owns the tools of intelligence — and it begins not with new AI platforms or relatively young hyperscalers, but with public utilities that have existed for decades.
Telecommunications networks wired the physical world. Now they have the opportunity, and the obligation, to wire the intelligent one.
Because telcos are regulated public utilities. They’re governed by federal laws like Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI), which mandate strict privacy, residency and on‑premise compliance. They’ve built decades of trust with citizens. When you dial 911, it goes through a telco, not a black‑box cloud. That infrastructure, protected by law and public mandate, is sovereign by design.
Now imagine AI built on that same trust.
Instead of sending personal data across the globe to anonymous models trained on unknown corpora, what if every call, text, health record or document stayed on local, telco‑operated servers? What if that intelligence ran on compact, domain‑specific models designed for privacy, transparency and control?
This is the architecture telcos need to build today.
The dominant narrative today equates sovereign AI with simply hosting a large language model in a country’s borders. That’s like putting a surveillance camera in your house and handing the footage to someone else.
True sovereignty means:
The models (and their weights) are yours.
The data never leaves your infrastructure.
The intelligence doesn’t report back to someone else.
This requires a shift in architecture, not just location.
The intelligence layer must be small, localized and memory‑aware. Not mega‑models in the cloud, but purpose‑built systems that live on‑prem or at the edge, integrated into existing telco‑grade infrastructure.
It’s a better fit for mission‑critical use cases that demand:
Auditable logic
Energy‑efficient inference
Zero data leakage
Here’s a thought experiment: Who owns your data right now?
Odds are, it’s training someone else’s intelligence.
Flip the architecture: What if you owned your own model? What if the AI you used at work, home, or in healthcare ran on your data, and stayed in your control from place‑to‑place?
Suddenly, your memory becomes your asset.
This kind of sovereignty becomes a currency. Not a handout. Not a black‑box subscription. But a licensed, accountable tool for agency. And at scale, a population of sovereign individuals creates a sovereign nation.
It may sound strange to position legacy companies like telcos as the heroes of the revolution that is defining and will continue to define the rest of this century.
However, in every communication revolution, from rotary phones to 5G, telcos have led the infrastructure shift. They know how to scale, comply and serve billions. They know redundancy. They understand the edge. They don’t just build for convenience and connection. They build for continuity.
Today, they’re sitting on the distribution network AI actually needs: base stations, RAN boxes, fiber routes, data centers and edge compute sites. They already own the pipes. They can now own the intelligence that flows through them.
But potential is not performance. To seize this mantle, telcos must aggressively modernize a legacy stack that has calcified for too long. If they remain content acting as “the pipe,” they will cede the future of intelligence to the very entities they are positioned to disrupt.
Several major telcos are already piloting on‑prem, memory‑augmented AI systems in partnership with NVIDIA and others. These early deployments show dramatic gains in cost and energy efficiency compared to centralized LLM approaches.
If you’re a federal CIO, CTO or CISO, here’s the uncomfortable truth: Your agency will never fully embrace AI until you solve for privacy, compliance and sovereignty. Right now, you’re stuck choosing between:
LLMs with compromised privacy and performance, or
Doing nothing at all.
There’s a third path: AI that is private, programmable, precise and built for your mission (not someone else’s product roadmap). Waiting for industry to adapt is abdication.
We’ve already seen what happens when public infrastructure is handed to a handful of companies. Social media optimized for engagement, not well‑being. The result? A generation grappling with mental‑health crises, polarization and manipulation.
If we repeat that mistake with AI by centralizing power in the hands of a few, you won’t just lose privacy. You’ll lose optionality, autonomy and the ability to dissent.
You’ll lose freedom.
This isn’t a question of if. It’s who.
Who defines intelligence in your country?
Who builds it?
Who governs it?
Who gets to decide what AI learns, remembers and does?
The answer should be you.
And the ones best positioned to deliver that promise at scale, from the ground to the edge, are the telcos—provided they have the foresight and business acumen to seize it.
Don’t just regulate AI. Architect it.
Mandate memory‑driven, on‑prem models.
Build compliance into the compute.
Treat personal memory as critical infrastructure.
Wire intelligence the way we once wired the world: with resilience, redundancy and respect for the sovereign rights of every citizen.
Because this isn’t a tech trend. It’s a geopolitical reset — and telcos can be the backbone.
Will Hurd is a former CIA undercover officer, member of Congress, and cybersecurity executive.
Suman Kanuganti is co‑founder and CEO of Personal AI. He previously founded Aira, an AI accessibility startup.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...