Is Terry Goodkind Trolling Me? | Wizard's First Rule Reading Vlog
Why It Matters
Understanding Goodkind’s narrative choices helps readers gauge whether the series aligns with their taste, and the Patreon format demonstrates how community‑driven reading can surface critical insights in real time.
Key Takeaways
- •Book is readable but contains overly simplistic, childlike dialogue.
- •Protagonist Richard's naive heroics clash with complex moral themes.
- •Author uses crowds as a single-minded entity for plot convenience.
- •Wizard Zed's eccentric wisdom highlights power's moral ambiguity.
- •Patreon 'Haters Book Club' format creates interactive, community-driven reading.
Summary
The video is a vlog‑style walkthrough of Terry Goodkind’s The Wizard’s First Rule, recorded for the creator’s Patreon “Haters Book Club” where patrons pick a novel for the host to read and discuss live.
The host notes the novel’s surprisingly smooth prose, calling it “super readable,” yet repeatedly points out dialogue that feels infantilized—such as Richard’s overtly moralistic “friend” speech—suggesting the narrative targets a younger audience despite its adult fantasy setting. He also highlights the book’s reliance on crowds acting as a single, unquestioning voice, especially during Michael’s fire‑preaching speech.
Specific moments cited include Richard’s naïve promise to a stranger, Michael’s melodramatic appeal to “fire” as the true enemy, Zed’s whimsical witch/warlock exchange, and the cat‑and‑mouse morality analogy. These examples illustrate Goodkind’s penchant for overt moralizing and simplistic crowd psychology.
The critique implies that while the story’s pacing and world‑building may engage new readers, its heavy‑handed moral lessons and one‑dimensional crowd reactions can alienate seasoned fantasy fans. For the Patreon community, the vlog serves both as a shared reading experience and a platform for dissecting the novel’s strengths and shortcomings.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...