The Indefinite Sublime: Tom McCarthy on Moby-Dick
Why It Matters
McCarthy’s reading reframes Moby‑Dick as a model for probing the limits of knowledge, offering scholars a bridge between literary analysis and the systemic thinking central to interdisciplinary research.
Key Takeaways
- •McCarthy links Moby‑Dick’s “whiteness” to the philosophical sublime.
- •He argues the novel’s blanks represent unknowable, infinite spaces.
- •Longinus’s concept of hypsos underpins Melville’s ecstatic prose bursts.
- •Burke’s “dark sublime” explains the terror without divine reassurance.
- •McCarthy sees Moby‑Dick as a parable of thought’s limits.
Summary
Tom McCarthy’s Santa Fe Institute talk, titled “The Indefinite Sublime,” uses Herman Melville’s Moby‑Dick as a laboratory for exploring how literature maps the unknowable. He opens by recalling a dream‑email anecdote and a playful mapping exercise—placing the novel on an A4 sheet versus an empty A5 envelope—to illustrate the book’s pervasive blanks and voids.
McCarthy argues that the novel’s recurring whiteness functions as a visual and conceptual blank, a “sublime of absence” that mirrors Longinus’s hypsos: moments where language erupts into ecstatic, thunder‑like bursts and then collapses into silence. He ties this to Edmund Burke’s “dark sublime,” where terror is felt without divine reassurance, and shows how Captain Ahab’s visions and the whale’s deformed mouth embody this rupture. References to Kant and the Kantian notion of formlessness further underscore the novel’s engagement with limitlessness.
Memorable moments include the quote from Cormac McCarthy—“Moby‑Dick is not a story you read once, it is a storm you survive”—and McCarthy’s own advice to writers: “buy more paper, use better paper, indent the first sentence.” He also highlights Melville’s bibliographic cetology, treating whale species as book chapters, to illustrate how knowledge itself is riddled with holes, echoing the indefinite.
The talk positions Moby‑Dick as a parable of thought’s boundaries, suggesting that literature, like scientific models, maps spaces that remain fundamentally unchartable. By weaving literary theory, philosophy, and institutional critique, McCarthy demonstrates how classic texts can inform contemporary interdisciplinary research, especially at places like the Santa Fe Institute where emergent systems are studied.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...