Higher Costs and Lower Prices Driving U.S. Cotton Acreage Decline

Why It Matters

Reduced cotton acreage tightens supply, pressuring global textile prices and reshaping farm income dynamics. The shift signals broader stress in commodity markets facing rising costs and stagnant prices.

Key Takeaways

• Cotton production costs up 30% year‑over‑year
• Expected U.S. cotton acreage falls to nine million
• Mid‑South region sees largest acreage reduction
• Lower planting intent may tighten global cotton supply
• USDA acreage report due March 31

Pulse Analysis

The cotton sector is confronting a perfect storm of rising input costs and falling farmgate prices, a combination that is eroding profitability for U.S. producers. Fertilizer, labor, and equipment expenses have climbed sharply, while global cotton prices have struggled to recover from recent lows. Even modest enhancements to the farm safety net, such as increased disaster assistance, are insufficient to bridge the widening gap between cost and revenue, prompting growers to reconsider the economics of planting cotton versus alternative crops.

Regional planting decisions underscore the depth of the challenge. The Mid‑South, traditionally a cotton stronghold, is seeing the most pronounced acreage cuts, reflecting both higher local production costs and weaker price signals. Georgia’s unexpected reduction further illustrates that the downturn is not confined to a single area. These shifts could curtail U.S. cotton output, tightening global supply and potentially nudging textile manufacturers toward higher-priced imports or alternative fibers, thereby influencing downstream pricing and inventory strategies.

Looking ahead, the USDA’s planting intentions report, slated for March 31, will provide a benchmark for the actual scale of acreage adjustments. Policymakers may need to evaluate more robust support mechanisms or cost‑reduction initiatives to sustain cotton production. Meanwhile, growers might diversify into higher‑margin crops or adopt precision‑agriculture technologies to mitigate cost pressures. The evolving landscape will shape not only the domestic cotton market but also the broader agricultural commodity environment in the coming years.

Higher costs and lower prices driving U.S. cotton acreage decline

Brownfield Ag News

Jody Campiche with the National Cotton Council says lower prices are the reason U.S. farmers say they’ll be planting less cotton this spring.

“While there are some changes to the farm safety net that will provide higher support this year, it’s still not enough to cover all the losses.”

Campiche says production costs are 30 percent higher for cotton compared to previous growing seasons.

“It makes it really hard to make the economics work for cotton, but part of the issue is when you look at other prices of commodities, they’re not great either.”

The results from a grower survey, conducted by the NCC, say U.S. farmers intend to plant nine million acres, a decline from last year. Campiche notes that, looking at the regional breakdowns, she was surprised to see a large decline in cotton acres expected in the mid‑South.

“Maybe the magnitude of the loss is a little higher than we expected, but you never know, by the time planting season comes around, growers might change their minds, maybe they won’t come down quite so low. In the past, we’ve had good yields in those areas.”

She adds it was also a surprise to see Georgia’s cotton planting intentions lower.

The USDA will also release its official acreage estimates in its planting intentions report, scheduled for March 31.

Hear Brownfield’s interview with Campiche.