Why Curry Brand Chose Li-Ning over Anta

Why Curry Brand Chose Li-Ning over Anta

KrASIA
KrASIAJun 9, 2026

Companies Mentioned

Li-Ning Group

Li-Ning Group

Anta Sports Ltd.

Anta Sports Ltd.

Under Armour

Under Armour

Nike

Nike

NKE

Salomon

Salomon

Amer Sports

Amer Sports

AS

Why It Matters

The partnership provides Li‑Ning a rare global NBA endorsement to accelerate its overseas basketball ambitions, while Curry gains unprecedented control over product design and athlete signings, potentially reshaping the sports‑apparel landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Curry Brand signs ten‑year deal with Li‑Ning, leaving Under Armour.
  • Li‑Ning retains $4.4 bn 2025 revenue, seeks global NBA star.
  • Curry keeps trademarks, can sign athletes, and controls product design.
  • Anta couldn’t match autonomy, offering Curry as one of many NBA partners.
  • Deal could turn Curry Brand into Li‑Ning’s flagship basketball platform.

Pulse Analysis

Stephen Curry’s move to Li‑Ning marks the latest chapter in a career defined by challenger‑brand alliances. After a decade with Under Armour, during which he built the Curry Brand into a sub‑line that released shoes from Curry 8 to Curry 13 and opened a flagship store in Chengdu, Curry negotiated a ten‑year agreement that preserves his trademarks and grants him full authority to sign athletes and steer product design. This level of creative control is rare in athlete endorsement deals, where most contracts simply purchase influence rather than cede ownership.

Li‑Ning, with 2025 revenue of roughly $4.4 billion and a net margin just under 10 %, has been searching for a marquee NBA name to lift its global basketball narrative. Unlike Anta, which already boasts a roster of NBA stars such as Klay Thompson and Kyrie Irving, Li‑Ning lacked a top‑tier international ambassador since Dwyane Wade’s retirement. Curry’s brand offers a singular focal point that can command Li‑Ning’s R&D, supply chain and marketing resources, turning the Chinese label into a conduit for U.S. college and high‑school sponsorships that were previously out of reach.

The asymmetry of the deal—Curry needing a partner that respects his autonomy, Li‑Ning craving a global star—creates both opportunity and risk. Replicating the Jordan Brand model is notoriously difficult; Nike’s royalty structure generated roughly $300 million for Michael Jordan in 2024 alone. Curry will have to prove that his brand can deliver comparable sales momentum in a slower‑growing basketball category. If successful, Li‑Ning could accelerate its overseas expansion and reshape the competitive dynamics of the sports‑apparel market, while Curry may finally achieve a Jordan‑like legacy under a non‑Western banner.

Why Curry Brand chose Li-Ning over Anta

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...