Richard Kerby - Latest News and Information
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests

Technology Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Sunday recap

NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts
Richard Kerby

Richard Kerby

Creator
0 followers

Recent Posts

Healthcare RCM: $300B Inefficiency Sparks Massive Innovation Opportunity
Social•Dec 1, 2025

Healthcare RCM: $300B Inefficiency Sparks Massive Innovation Opportunity

At Field Ventures, we invest in vertical software businesses that modernize antiquated industries. Today, we're witnessing one of the most compelling opportunities in healthcare technology: revenue cycle management (RCM). With over $280 billion flowing through the U.S. healthcare billing system annually and administrative costs reaching $300 billion per year, the RCM space represents a massive market ripe for disruption. The numbers tell a stark story. Hospital operating margins have been declining for years and now sit at 2.6% , while claim denial rates have now reached 15% . Rising administrative costs, denials, and slower payment cycles are leading to increased costs for patients. This perfect storm of financial pressure creates an urgent need for innovation and a massive opportunity for founders building the next generation of RCM solutions. The Broken RCM Status Quo: A $300B Inefficiency Healthcare revenue cycle management encompasses the entire journey from patient scheduling to final payment collection. The process remains largely manual, involving the collection of patient information, clinical documentation, medical coding, claims submission, and denial appeals. Each step requires multiple human touchpoints, creating countless opportunities for errors and delays. Below is an illustrative example of the entire RCM process. Consider the scale of inefficiency: on average, industry experts believe hospitals leave 1% - 3% of revenue on the table due to coding errors alone. Given that the average hospital in the US generates ~$240 million annually, that's millions in lost revenue, enough to fund an MRI machine or additional nursing staff. Payment cycles commonly extend beyond 120 days, which leaves an average provider waiting months to be reimbursed by insurance for services already delivered. For many providers, this creates a cash flow crisis that threatens operational stability. Labor shortages across billing and coding roles have compounded the issue, with 90% of healthcare systems reporting an RCM labor shortage. To keep up, 77% of organizations rely heavily on offshore teams or RCM service firms. These teams are expected to manually navigate evolving payer rules and increasing documentation requirements across fragmented systems, an approach that causes operational deficiencies. The result is a growing administrative burden where both providers and billers spend a disproportionate amount of time fighting denials rather than optimizing the overall revenue cycle. Software historically struggled to penetrate this space because RCM workflows involve massive amounts of unstructured, unreadable data trapped in faxes, voicemails, and fragmented systems. Payment flows are stitched together by hundreds of thousands of people employed by health systems and outsourced RCM service providers. Companies like R1 RCM employ approximately 30,000 people and operate at roughly 20% gross margins, a business model built on labor arbitrage rather than technology leverage. But recent regulatory changes and technical breakthroughs are finally removing these barriers. The 21st Century Cures Act promotes interoperability, pricing transparency rules mandate publication of reimbursement rates, and new CMS proposals would digitize prior authorization processes. Combined with advances in large language models, natural language processing, and optical character recognition, we now have the tools to automate tasks that were previously impossible. The Two Common Software Approaches We've Seen Approach #1: Software Businesses Selling to Providers This approach involves building full-service RCM software platforms that sell directly to providers, hospitals, health systems, and physician groups. These solutions typically address multiple stages of the revenue cycle, from patient eligibility verification through final payment posting. There are ~ 400,000 physician group practices and over 6,000 hospitals in the US., representing over 100 specialties and sub-specialties with varying medical coding needs and billing complexity. While healthcare is massive and this approach enables providers to focus on care versus billing, it is extremely fragmented, and larger hospital systems have many stakeholders and long sales cycles. While RCM solutions can gain traction in specific segments of the healthcare market, we believe this approach has relatively low barriers to entry, which is why we have seen this segment become increasingly crowded. Approach #2: Software Selling to Payers The second approach targets the opposite side of the equation: insurance payers. These companies develop AI-powered platforms that enable payers to process claims more efficiently, detect fraud, identify underpayments, and make more accurate adjudication decisions. This approach can reduce the administrative burden of retrospective audits that payers are currently facing. However, this is a customer base with extremely long sales cycles and not fragmented enough to capture leverage via automation. A Third, More Compelling Approach While both of the above strategies can have positive impacts on the healthcare market, we at Field are most excited about a third approach: AI software designed specifically for RCM service firms. This aligns with our Service-as-a-Software investment thesis : software that acts as a digital worker. Traditional RCM service providers employ tens of thousands of people performing repetitive, rules-based tasks. By building software that dramatically increases the productivity of these service firms, companies can capture enormous value while helping the entire healthcare ecosystem operate more efficiently. Why This Approach Wins 1. Large Total Addressable Market Rather than selling to individual providers or payers, software that powers RCM service firms can reach the entire ecosystem. The top RCM services companies, like R1 RCM, serve over 750 healthcare organizations, Access Healthcare manages over $120 billion in claims annually with 27,000 revenue cycle professionals, and Optum360 employs 7,700 performance experts. Optum acquired Change for ~$13 billion, with its RCM capabilities being a key driver of the acquisition. Improving the efficiency of service firms of this scale represents a multibillion-dollar opportunity. 2. One-to-Many GTM with Clear ROI Unlike individual hospitals or physician groups, which may resist workflow changes, RCM service providers have direct economic incentives to adopt tools that reduce their cost structure. They also have centralized decision-making, reducing lengthy sales cycles and minimizing change management friction associated with selling into fragmented healthcare delivery organizations. Partnering with an RCM service firm gives a business access to hundreds or thousands of providers at once rather than selling to each provider individually. That said, these RCM service firms can be harder to find, as they tend not to have a strong online presence. 3. Deeper Data Moats Software that sits at the core of RCM service operations process millions of claims across hundreds of payers and thousands of providers. This aggregated, cross-cutting view of the entire healthcare billing ecosystem creates proprietary insights and defensible network effects. The data advantage here is particularly powerful: pattern matching at scale is the key to solving medical billing automation. The majority of denials can be avoided by addressing problems earlier in the process, before the claim is even submitted. As the platform processes more data, it becomes increasingly aware of payer-specific idiosyncrasies, coding nuances, and denial patterns, creating a virtuous cycle of improved performance and decreasing need for human intervention. This creates a strong data advantage and a path towards a fully AI-native RCM service firm. 4. Revenue Model Alignment RCM service firms charge based on outcomes, recovered revenue, increased collections, or reduced denials, rather than seat-based SaaS pricing. Billers typically charge providers a percentage of net collections, which means they’re directly incentivized to collect more money and prevent denials. Software that helps service firms win more business while reducing costs makes the purchase decision straightforward. The convergence of market tailwinds, labor constraints, and regulatory changes creates a unique window of opportunity: For entrepreneurs considering opportunities in healthcare RCM, several factors will determine success: Integration Complexity is Real: Success often hinges on deep integration with EHR systems like Epic, Cerner, and Athenahealth. Companies with strong partnerships or native integrations have significant advantages. Human-in-the-Loop Beats Full Automation: Despite AI advances, healthcare providers remain skeptical of fully autonomous solutions. The most successful companies combine AI with human expertise to handle edge cases and build trust. Billers need systems that augment their intelligence, not replace them entirely. Data is the Moat: The most defensible companies in this space are those that process high volumes of claims across multiple payers and providers, building proprietary datasets that continuously improve their models. This creates network effects that competitors can’t easily replicate. Go Multi-Product Eventually: While point solutions can gain initial traction, the real opportunity lies in connecting multiple workflows, from documentation to coding to denial appeals, into comprehensive platforms. Companies that can expand from a wedge product to full-stack solutions will capture the most value. Conclusion: The Decacorn+ Opportunity Healthcare accounts for nearly 20% of the US GDP. The scale of the industry creates potential for category-defining outcomes. But the game-changing opportunities will be captured by companies that think beyond point solutions to build platforms that deliver measurable outcomes: reduced denials, faster collections, and lower labor costs. We believe the Service-as-a-Software model, focused on empowering RCM service firms, represents the most compelling opportunity because it combines a large market, an efficient go-to-market motion, outcome-aligned pricing, and data-driven defensibility. At Field, we're actively seeking founders building in this space. The healthcare RCM market is massive, the pain points are acute, and the technology is finally ready. The next leaders in RCM will be those who apply automation at the service layer, where AI-powered software performs the work directly. If you are working on an RCM solution, would like to discuss the space, or have viewpoints on different approaches, please reach out!

By Richard Kerby