Rising system costs threaten consumer affordability and could undermine the UK’s net‑zero transition, pressuring policymakers to balance investment with price stability.
The looming electricity price spike reflects a broader structural challenge for the UK energy market. While the government’s ambition to modernise the grid is essential for integrating offshore wind and meeting net‑zero targets, the financing model relies heavily on network charges passed directly to consumers. This approach amplifies the cost burden on households already coping with volatile wholesale markets, creating a political dilemma for energy ministers who have pledged bill reductions.
Investors and utilities are also watching the £28 billion initial spend as a signal of the sector’s capital intensity. If the full £90 billion pipeline proceeds, it will demand sustained funding streams, potentially attracting private capital but also raising questions about return expectations and regulatory risk. System costs—encompassing new pylons, cables, and digital controls—are projected to dominate the price equation, dwarfing traditional generation expenses and reshaping the economics of both fossil‑fuel and renewable projects.
For businesses and consumers alike, the forecast underscores the importance of demand‑side management and energy efficiency measures. Companies may accelerate adoption of smart‑metering, on‑site generation, and storage to hedge against rising tariffs. Meanwhile, policymakers must consider targeted subsidies or tiered pricing to protect vulnerable households while still delivering the infrastructure needed for a resilient, low‑carbon grid. Balancing these priorities will be critical to maintaining public support for the energy transition.
By City A.M · Feb 13 2026, 2:00 PM CST
Electricity bills will be higher in 2030 than in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the boss of British Gas has warned, as the government pushes through major upgrades to the UK’s grid infrastructure.
Chris O’Shea, chief executive of British Gas‑owner Centrica, said the UK was playing catch‑up after years of under‑investment, and now faced significantly higher costs.
“We’ve underinvested in the system for many years, and whether it’s the cost of building a new gas‑fired power station or a new wind farm, the costs have gone up,” he said at an event hosted by the Energy Institute.
“Our projections show that the UK energy system will be one where, by 2030, the electricity price will be higher than it was at the peak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine,” he added.
O’Shea said two‑thirds of the costs would be on system costs while the remaining third would be wholesale costs.
“Those system costs aren’t net‑zero costs,” he said. “They are addressing years and years of under‑investment and whether we went for net zero or new fossil fuels, we would need to incur those system costs.”
His comments highlight the challenges facing the government in bringing down the cost of electricity bills while also upgrading the UK’s outdated grid infrastructure.
Last year Britain’s network companies were given the green light to spend £28 billion on upgrading the gas and electricity grids, forming the first part of a wider investment pipeline which could cost around £90 billion if approved.
The investment will go towards new pylons and cables to connect with wind farms being constructed around the British coastline. It will primarily be funded through higher network charges on household energy bills.
Ofgem estimates that this will add £108 a year to bills by 2031, threatening energy secretary Ed Miliband’s pledge to bring down average energy bills by around £300 before the end of the decade.
Claire Coutinho, shadow energy secretary, said: “If gas went to zero, bills would still rise because Ed Miliband is building a system that is incredibly expensive. Despite having an undeniably radical policy, he has never forecast the impact of his plans on your bills.”
By City A.M
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...