60% of Institutional Investors Intend to Increase ILS Allocations: Gallagher Securities Survey

60% of Institutional Investors Intend to Increase ILS Allocations: Gallagher Securities Survey

Artemis (ILS/cat bonds)
Artemis (ILS/cat bonds)May 21, 2026

Why It Matters

The shift signals a surge of third‑party capital into the reinsurance market, enhancing capacity and potentially lowering costs for insurers. It also underscores the growing importance of uncorrelated, high‑yield assets in institutional portfolios.

Key Takeaways

  • 60% plan to boost ILS allocations within two years
  • 79% target catastrophe bonds as primary ILS vehicle
  • 53% aim for reinsurance sidecar investments
  • Only 21% consider direct insurance equity or debt
  • 73% seek property catastrophe returns; cyber risk follows at 27%

Pulse Analysis

Institutional appetite for insurance‑linked securities is accelerating, driven by the assets’ low correlation with traditional markets and attractive risk‑adjusted returns. The Gallagher Securities survey, which sampled senior decision‑makers at firms managing over $1 billion, shows that 60% intend to raise ILS exposure in the next 24 months. This trend reflects a broader diversification push, as investors seek to hedge against equity volatility while tapping into the steady cash flows generated by catastrophe risk underwriting.

Catastrophe bonds emerge as the clear favorite, with 79% of respondents earmarking them for new allocations. Their appeal lies in well‑defined trigger mechanisms, transparent loss reporting, and the ability to scale exposure efficiently. Reinsurance sidecars also attract significant interest, drawing 53% of the surveyed pool, as they offer direct alignment with underwriting performance and bespoke risk profiles. By contrast, only a modest 21% are pursuing direct equity or debt stakes in insurers, citing higher operational complexity and governance burdens. This preference for structured, liquid instruments is reshaping capital flows toward the reinsurance sector, bolstering capacity for insurers to underwrite large‑scale risks.

Looking ahead, the influx of institutional capital could compress ILS pricing, prompting issuers to innovate with new risk layers such as cyber and casualty exposures, which already show emerging demand at 27% and 23% respectively. Enhanced transparency and governance standards are becoming non‑negotiable, as investors demand clear metrics on underwriting quality and return expectations. As the ILS market matures, its role as a bridge between capital markets and the insurance industry is set to deepen, offering a resilient avenue for yield in an increasingly uncertain macroeconomic environment.

60% of institutional investors intend to increase ILS allocations: Gallagher Securities survey

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...