‘No One Knew I Was in a Different Time Zone’: The Workers Who Travel, Play Tennis, and Do Chores on the Clock

‘No One Knew I Was in a Different Time Zone’: The Workers Who Travel, Play Tennis, and Do Chores on the Clock

Fast Company
Fast CompanyApr 17, 2026

Companies Mentioned

Why It Matters

Soft off days challenge traditional time‑based management, forcing companies to prioritize results over rigid schedules and to address employee well‑being and compensation gaps.

Key Takeaways

  • Soft off days let remote workers run errands during paid hours
  • Employees cite low pay and burnout as primary motivators
  • Managers focus on output, not how work hours are spent
  • Companies risk policy gaps as flexible work becomes norm
  • Ethical debate centers on results versus strict time tracking

Pulse Analysis

The rise of soft off days reflects a broader shift in how work is measured. Since the pandemic normalized remote setups, employees have blurred the line between personal and professional time, turning paid hours into a hybrid space for errands, fitness, and even weekend travel. This behavior, often labeled "time theft," is less about shirking duties and more about reclaiming autonomy in a landscape where traditional office oversight is absent. By staying active on collaboration tools, workers argue they meet or exceed expectations while gaining personal flexibility.

Underlying drivers include stagnant wages, heightened burnout, and a growing emphasis on mental health. A recent Pew survey found roughly 70% of U.S. workers feel underpaid for their output, prompting many to use soft off days as a compensatory mechanism. Psychotherapists and executive coaches note that such micro‑breaks can reduce cognitive load, improve focus, and ultimately sustain productivity. When employees can schedule a tennis match or a quick flight without jeopardizing deliverables, they report higher job satisfaction and lower turnover risk, suggesting a win‑win if managed responsibly.

For employers, the phenomenon forces a reevaluation of performance metrics and cultural norms. Companies that cling to clock‑in policies risk alienating talent and missing out on the productivity gains of outcome‑based management. Conversely, clear guidelines that allow discretionary time—provided key results are met—can foster trust and reduce burnout. Leaders should invest in transparent expectations, flexible scheduling tools, and regular check‑ins to ensure that soft off days enhance, rather than erode, organizational performance.

‘No one knew I was in a different time zone’: The workers who travel, play tennis, and do chores on the clock

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...