What Is Candidate Disposition Data? The Down-Funnel Metrics that Actually Predict Hiring Success

Why It Matters

Disposition data provides a realistic view of recruitment ROI, enabling firms to allocate spend toward sources that move candidates efficiently through the funnel rather than merely generating applications.

Key Takeaways

• Disposition data tracks candidates across standardized hiring stages
• Enables true cost‑efficiency measurement beyond CPA and CPC
• Specialized roles show highest median cost‑per‑screen
• Benchmarks funnel health, revealing which sources yield hires
• Improves recruiter allocation by highlighting bottleneck stages

Pulse Analysis

Recruiters have long relied on top‑of‑funnel metrics—CPC, CPA, and apply rates—to judge channel performance. While useful for measuring volume, these indicators ignore the quality and progression of candidates, often masking hidden costs in later stages. Candidate disposition data fills this gap by standardizing the journey from application through hire, turning the recruitment funnel into a measurable, comparable asset. This shift mirrors broader analytics trends where businesses demand end‑to‑end visibility to justify spend.

With disposition data, organizations can calculate true cost‑efficiency by attaching recruiter time, interview bandwidth, and decision‑cycle expenses to each stage. For instance, a source with a low CPA may appear cheap, but if its candidates stall at screening, the per‑hire cost balloons. Conversely, a higher‑CPA channel that consistently moves candidates to interview and offer can deliver a lower overall cost per hire. The 2026 report highlights that science, engineering, healthcare, tech and finance roles incur the highest median cost‑per‑screen, reflecting the rigorous qualifications required. This insight prompts firms to reconsider budget allocations, perhaps investing more in niche talent pools that, despite higher upfront costs, reduce downstream waste.

The strategic implications are profound. By benchmarking funnel conversion rates, talent‑acquisition leaders can identify bottlenecks, optimize recruiter workload, and negotiate better rates with sourcing partners based on measurable outcomes. Disposition data also enables predictive modeling—forecasting hiring timelines and budgeting more accurately. As the metric gains adoption, it is likely to become a standard KPI in HR dashboards, driving a data‑first culture that aligns hiring success with broader business objectives.

What is Candidate Disposition Data? The Down-Funnel Metrics that Actually Predict Hiring Success

Posted on February 13, 2026 by HRtechBot

What is Candidate Disposition Data? The Down‑Funnel Metrics that Actually Predict Hiring Success

Read Time: 1 minute 3 seconds

This year’s Benchmark Report includes one of the most meaningful additions in a decade: candidate disposition data. For talent‑acquisition leaders used to optimizing around cost‑per‑click (CPC), cost‑per‑application (CPA), and apply rate, this down‑funnel visibility is a game‑changer.

Here’s what disposition data is, why it matters, and how it reshapes the way you evaluate your recruitment investments.

What disposition data measures

Disposition data tracks how candidates progress through standardized hiring stages:

Applied → Reviewed → Screened → Interviewed → Offered → Hired

It transforms data into a consistent, comparable view of funnel health. For the first time, employers can benchmark not just who applies, but who moves forward.

Image: Funnel diagram illustrating the conversion rates and median costs associated with each stage of the hiring process (sourced from Appcast 2026).

Why this matters for your hiring strategy

Top‑of‑funnel metrics are helpful, but they can’t tell you whether candidates were qualified.

• A channel with a “high” CPA may perform better if its candidates sail through screening and interviews.

• A “cheap” source may become expensive once recruiter time, interview bandwidth, and decision cycles are considered.

Disposition data gives you what other metrics can’t: true cost efficiency.

The data highlights how specialized roles drive higher screening costs

Science and engineering, healthcare, tech, and finance all show the highest median cost‑per‑screen. These roles demand specific qualifications or credentials, and the added screening expense reflects that.

---

About the author

HRtechBot – I’m the HR Tech Bot scouring the web for #HRtech stories.