The merger could reshape North American freight logistics, concentrating market power and influencing rates, capacity, and competition across the supply chain.
Regulatory scrutiny has become the central hurdle for the Union Pacific‑Norfolk Southern merger. The Surface Transportation Board, responding to concerns about market concentration and incomplete disclosures, demanded a more detailed application that clarifies cancellation rights, quantifies significant acquisitions, and provides robust market‑share forecasts. This heightened oversight reflects a broader trend of U.S. agencies tightening standards for mega‑mergers in critical infrastructure sectors, aiming to preserve competition and protect shippers from potential monopolistic practices.
From a strategic perspective, UP argues the combined network will deliver a seamless, coast‑to‑coast service that can capture freight currently moving by truck. By targeting a 75% growth share from highway‑to‑rail conversion, the merged entity seeks to capitalize on sustainability mandates and rising fuel costs, offering shippers a more reliable and environmentally friendly alternative. The projected 39% share of gross tonnage miles positions the new railroad alongside BNSF as a dominant player, potentially reshaping pricing dynamics and service standards across the industry.
However, the merger faces formidable opposition. Competitors such as BNSF, CPKC, CN and CSX have formally urged the STB to reject the filing, citing concerns over reduced competition and market access. Labor groups, notably the Teamsters Transport Workers Union, are prepared to block the deal, arguing it could harm workers and diminish bargaining power. These combined pressures suggest that even if UP resubmits a compliant application, the path to approval will be contested, with significant implications for the future structure of North American rail freight.
Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena announced the railroad will resubmit its merger filing with Norfolk Southern at the end of April after the Surface Transportation Board rejected the initial application. The $85bn tie‑up would combine the two carriers, creating a rail network that controls about 39% of U.S. freight tonnage.
Source: The Loadstar

Photo: © Dan Ross
By Alexander Whiteman19/02/2026
Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena caught investors off-guard yesterday, announcing UP plans to resubmit its Norfolk Southern merger filing at the end of April, claiming US regulators had changed the requirements.
Having seen its initial application with the Surface Transportation Board (STB)rebuffed at the start of the year, on the grounds of missing information, the expectation had been that an amended application would be submitted at some point in March.
“Last week, [the STB] told us the way they wanted to see the information was different than we thought three weeks ago, after they’d sent it back to us to put more information in,” Mr Vena told attendees at the Barclays 43rd Annual Industrial Select Conference.
“By regulation, we had to give [the STB] an answer on 17 February, whether we’re going to reapply and when they could expect the application. So, we put out yesterday that it’s the end of April.”
The STB rejected UP’s initial application on three grounds: it did not detail UP obligations and its ability to cancel the deal; that it described associated acquisitions the STB considered “significant” as “minor”; and market share projections were absent.
The rejection came on the back of a series of separate, but broadly aligned, STB filings in January from rival railroads BNSF, CPKC), CN, and CSX urging the board to reject the merger filing on the basis it was incomplete.
Addressing that opposition, Mr Vena suggested there was no difference between UP’s proposed tie-up with Norfolk Southern than the merger that resulted in CPKC.
“Keith [Creel, CPKC CEO] is a real smart guy. I’ve known him a long time, and I give him accolades on what he’s been able to do. When he was putting together CPKC, he talked about single-line, seamless, better competition, and that was the story,” he said.
“And what we’re talking about is a seamless operation that enhances movement, and it gives customers better optionality.”
Mr Vena also sought to draw parallels between a UP-NS entity and BNSF, pointing out that the merged entity would control about 39% of US railroads’ gross tonnage miles, the same volume percentage BNSF handles.
UP CFO Jennifer Hamann told investors UP/NS would target growth by offering an alternative to road, saying: “75% of the business we’re expecting to grow is coming off the highway. It’s not coming from another railroad.”
News / Union Pacific to launch new bid for NS merger green light
==================================================================================================================================================================================================================
WMT: ONE CENT BEATZIM: FEEL THE PRESSUREDHL: AIR COLD CHAINBA: ORDERS TALKTFII: CAPITAL ALLOCATIONTFII: DEALS PIPELINEWTC: MIND THE SPREADJBHT: INSIGHT ON BIG RAIL DEAL-MAKINGJBHT: FRIENDLY TECHJBHT: INSIGHT ON AIDSV: ACTIVIST INVESTOR TAKES STAKE IN ALIBABA TOOTFII: EARNINGS BEAT
WMT: ONE CENT BEATZIM: FEEL THE PRESSUREDHL: AIR COLD CHAINBA: ORDERS TALKTFII: CAPITAL ALLOCATIONTFII: DEALS PIPELINEWTC: MIND THE SPREADJBHT: INSIGHT ON BIG RAIL DEAL-MAKINGJBHT: FRIENDLY TECHJBHT: INSIGHT ON AIDSV: ACTIVIST INVESTOR TAKES STAKE IN ALIBABA TOOTFII: EARNINGS BEAT
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Related Stories
Previous Next
Topics
Canadian National (CN)Canadian Pacific Kansas City Southern (CPKC)CSXUnion Pacific-Norfolk Southern mergerUS Surface Transportation Board (STB)
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...