Jimmy Hoover: Can AI Give You a Seat Inside the Supreme Court?
•February 18, 2026
0
Why It Matters
The platform democratizes access to the nation’s highest court, fostering greater civic engagement and setting a precedent for AI‑driven legal communication. It also signals a shift toward more open, technology‑enabled public institutions.
Key Takeaways
- •AI avatars simulate justices reading opinions
- •Authentic archival audio powers the narration
- •Creates a virtual public gallery experience
- •Demonstrates AI’s role in legal transparency
- •Could reshape future court media policies
Pulse Analysis
The Supreme Court has long balanced tradition with incremental openness, most recently by live‑streaming oral arguments. Yet the public gallery, where citizens can watch justices deliver opinion announcements, remains physically limited and often inaccessible. This scarcity has sparked debate about the Court’s transparency, especially as digital natives demand real‑time, immersive experiences of civic institutions. By examining the historical constraints of courtroom access, we see a clear opportunity for technology to fill the gap without compromising the Court’s procedural integrity.
On the Docket leverages generative AI to craft lifelike three‑dimensional avatars of each justice, synchronizing them with original audio recordings from the National Archives. The result is a seamless video that mimics a live reading in the courtroom, complete with realistic gestures and lighting. This approach not only preserves the authenticity of the justices’ voices but also circumvents the logistical hurdles of physical attendance. For legal scholars, journalists, and the public, the tool offers an on‑demand, shareable window into the Court’s decision‑making process, expanding educational and analytical possibilities.
The broader implications extend beyond a single project. As AI becomes more adept at reproducing authoritative figures, courts and other governmental bodies may adopt similar solutions to enhance transparency while managing security and decorum concerns. However, the rise of synthetic media also raises questions about authenticity, consent, and potential misuse. Stakeholders in legal tech, media policy, and civil liberties will need to navigate these challenges, establishing standards that protect the integrity of judicial communication while embracing the democratizing power of AI. The success of On the Docket could catalyze a new era of open, technology‑enabled jurisprudence.
Jimmy Hoover: Can AI Give You a Seat Inside the Supreme Court?
Extract from Jimmy Hoover’s article “Can AI Give You a Seat Inside the Supreme Court?“
As the U.S. Supreme Court has embraced live audio broadcasting of oral arguments, one practice remains stubbornly stuck in the 18th century.
Since the days of Chief Justice John Jay, those interested in seeing members of the high court read their opinions aloud must still nab a seat in the court’s limited public gallery. There are audio recordings of opinion announcements but, for reasons the Supreme Court generally declines to articulate, those are made public only months after the fact through the National Archives.
To fling open the courthouse doors, a group of Supreme Court watchers and designers is now using artificial intelligence to generate videos of the justices’ avatars reading their opinions aloud as part of a provocative project called “On the Docket.” While AI is used to create the visuals of the scene, the audio comes from the actual recordings of opinion announcements taken from the Archives.
The post Jimmy Hoover: Can AI Give You a Seat Inside the Supreme Court? appeared first on ACEDS.
0
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...