The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Gannett v. Halifax Regional Centre for Education clarified that a statutory "review" triggers a limited judicial intervention rather than a full appellate standard. Justice Fichaud rejected Gannett’s request for correctness review, applying the reasonableness standard consistent with the Vavilov framework. The decision emphasized that the statutory reference to the Board as an "expert body" no longer mandates deference, as Vavilov has rendered expertise a secondary consideration. Ultimately, the case illustrates how legislative language drafted under older doctrines can become redundant as administrative law evolves.
The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that Ontario Energy Board staff letters can constitute binding legal determinations, not merely advisory opinions. The decision arose from a dispute over whether a new substation was an expansion or enhancement, prompting the parties...
The Law Reform Commission of Ireland released a Consultation Paper on Non‑Court Adjudicative Bodies, unveiled at a Dublin event on February 20, 2026. The launch, chaired by Justice Bolger, featured remarks from Paul Daly, former Attorney General Frank Clarke, and former Chief...
The Federal Court of Appeal unanimously held that the federal government’s use of the Emergencies Act during the 2022 Freedom Convoy protests was unlawful. The court applied the Vavilov framework, finding the government failed to meet objective legal and factual...