The Delaware Supreme Court in Fortis Advisors v. Stillfront held that an earn‑out dispute clause referencing the “calculation of the earn‑out amount” triggers arbitration, not merely expert determination. The court affirmed that the accounting firm acting as arbitrator could resolve all earn‑out issues, including bad‑faith claims and covenant breaches, even when no numerical calculation was involved. This ruling upholds the Chancery Court’s arbitration award in the buyer’s favor. The decision highlights the importance of precise ADR language in merger agreements to avoid unintended arbitration scope.
The Deal Lawyers newsletter’s January‑February 2026 issue has just gone to print and is available online for subscribers. Targeted at M&A attorneys, private equity professionals, and corporate counsel, the publication curates rapid‑fire developments that shape dealmaking across jurisdictions. Its reputation...
EY’s latest Private Equity Pulse shows sponsors are increasingly confident about 2026 exits after a resurgence in 2025. Trade sales rebounded sharply, driven by pent‑up strategic demand and stronger board‑level conviction. In total, U.S. firms recorded $481 billion of sales to...
McKinsey’s latest survey shows generative AI is reshaping M&A, delivering roughly 20% cost savings and accelerating deal cycles by 30‑50%. While 42% of respondents believe AI can transform the transaction process, only 30% are using it at moderate to high...