Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz

Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz

Publication
0 followers

Long-standing independent employment law commentary for HR leaders (CT focus with national relevance).

New Podcast Episode: When HR Meets Operations
NewsApr 2, 2026

New Podcast Episode: When HR Meets Operations

The latest episode of the "From Lawyer to Employer" podcast features veteran HR leader Jeanine Reckdenwald discussing her transition from pure HR to an operations‑focused role. The conversation highlights how HR decisions intersect with finance, customer experience, and overall business...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
Can You Take a Joke? Fifteen Years Later, the Answer Is Still “Maybe”
NewsApr 1, 2026

Can You Take a Joke? Fifteen Years Later, the Answer Is Still “Maybe”

The blog revisits April Fools’ Day workplace prank litigation, recalling two 2011 cases and highlighting the 2023 *Banks v. GM* decision where a single noose created a hostile‑work‑environment claim. It underscores that jokes targeting race, sex, religion or disability cross the...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
Connecticut Appellate Court Delivers a Triple Punch in Tip Credit Cases
NewsMar 31, 2026

Connecticut Appellate Court Delivers a Triple Punch in Tip Credit Cases

The Connecticut Appellate Court affirmed trial courts' motions to strike three tip‑credit class actions—Farias v. Rodriguez, Woodford v. HRG Management, and Vasquez v. Sliders Restaurant Group. The court held that the old tip‑credit record‑keeping provisions (old E3) do not create...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
Bostock, Executive Orders, and the Evolving Framework for Gender Identity Discrimination: Takeaways From the ABA ERR Conference
NewsMar 16, 2026

Bostock, Executive Orders, and the Evolving Framework for Gender Identity Discrimination: Takeaways From the ABA ERR Conference

At the ABA Employment Rights and Responsibilities Midwinter Meeting, panelists examined the EEOC’s recent Selina S. v. Driscoll decision, which reinterprets Title VII to allow federal agencies to restrict transgender employees from gender‑aligned facilities, overturning the 2015 Lusardi precedent. The...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
General Assembly Poised to Consider Wide Array of Workplace Bills
NewsMar 9, 2026

General Assembly Poised to Consider Wide Array of Workplace Bills

Connecticut’s General Assembly is set to hear a slate of employment‑focused bills during the week of March 9, 2026, ranging from an omnibus workforce‑development measure (HB 5003) to targeted reforms on NDAs, AI hiring tools, and wage transparency. Key proposals include expanding...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
Upcoming Panel on Gender Identity and Workplace Protections with Former EEOC General Counsel
NewsFeb 23, 2026

Upcoming Panel on Gender Identity and Workplace Protections with Former EEOC General Counsel

An upcoming ABA Employment Rights and Responsibilities Midwinter Meeting in Nashville will feature a panel on “Bostock, Executive Orders and the Evolving Framework for Gender Identity Discrimination.” The discussion, moderated by Meta’s Nicole Groves Bridgeforth, includes former EEOC General Counsel...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
New Podcast Episode: What Employers Need to Know About Arbitration Clauses
NewsFeb 20, 2026

New Podcast Episode: What Employers Need to Know About Arbitration Clauses

The latest "From Lawyer to Employer" podcast episode tackles arbitration clauses in employment contracts, featuring host and Emily McDonough Souza. It outlines arbitration’s speed, privacy, and legal focus while warning against treating it as a default solution. The discussion highlights...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz
Did You Hear That? Smart Glasses, AI Voice Recorders and Workplace Recordings
NewsFeb 18, 2026

Did You Hear That? Smart Glasses, AI Voice Recorders and Workplace Recordings

Employers now face a wave of discreet recording tools—from Ray‑Ban Meta smart glasses to AI‑powered voice recorders like Plaud and auto‑joining meeting bots that generate searchable transcripts. Connecticut’s one‑party consent rule for in‑person conversations and stricter electronic‑monitoring statutes mean many...

By Employment Law (US) – Dan Schwartz