Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)

Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)

Publication
0 followers

Independent litigation updates on M&A disputes, activism and fiduciary duties

Court of Chancery Rejects Fiduciary Duty and Veil-Piercing Theories in Crypto Case
NewsMay 20, 2026

Court of Chancery Rejects Fiduciary Duty and Veil-Piercing Theories in Crypto Case

The Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed Hash Asset Management’s lawsuit against DMA Labs and related parties, finding it lacked subject‑matter jurisdiction because the fiduciary‑duty and veil‑piercing claims were insufficiently pled. The court emphasized that commercial relationships between sophisticated parties do...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight From an...
NewsMay 18, 2026

When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight From an...

A May 7, 2026 Southern District of New York decision rejected the government’s attempt to blame ChatGPT for terminating over 1,400 DEI‑related federal grants. The court found the agency’s AI‑assisted workflow lacked meaningful human oversight, proper prompt design, and documentation, rendering it...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Texas Corporate Litigation Reforms Take Hold: Federal Court Enforces Texas’s 3% Ownership Requirement for Derivative Claims
NewsMay 12, 2026

Texas Corporate Litigation Reforms Take Hold: Federal Court Enforces Texas’s 3% Ownership Requirement for Derivative Claims

Texas Senate Bill 29, enacted in 2025, permits corporations with over 500 shareholders to impose a 3% ownership threshold for derivative lawsuits. In the March 2026 decision *Gusinsky v. Reynolds*, a U.S. District Court dismissed a Southwest Airlines shareholder claim...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Who Started It? Delaware Court of Chancery to Address Whether Contacting DOJ Is ‘Initiating’ a Proceeding in Advancement Case
NewsMay 5, 2026

Who Started It? Delaware Court of Chancery to Address Whether Contacting DOJ Is ‘Initiating’ a Proceeding in Advancement Case

On March 6, 2026 a Delaware Court of Chancery magistrate issued a report in Rushikesh Manche v. MVMT Labs, Inc. that affirmed the former CFO’s right to advancement of legal fees despite the company’s claim he had "initiated" the DOJ investigation into...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Securities Litigation Against Life Sciences Companies: 2025
NewsMay 1, 2026

Securities Litigation Against Life Sciences Companies: 2025

Securities class actions against publicly traded life‑sciences firms remained steady in 2025, with 44 new filings matching the prior year. Defendants succeeded in 59% of dispositive motions, a rate consistent with historical trends. Pre‑approval product cases enjoyed a higher dismissal...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Bad Investments, Not Bad Faith: Caremark Claims Have Limits
NewsApr 21, 2026

Bad Investments, Not Bad Faith: Caremark Claims Have Limits

The Delaware Court of Chancery in Marchner v. B. Riley reaffirmed that Caremark claims are limited to situations where directors actually know of legal violations, not merely poor investment outcomes. The court dismissed a shareholder derivative suit because the plaintiff...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces the Importance of Precision in Drafting ADR Provisions in Merger Agreements
NewsApr 14, 2026

Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces the Importance of Precision in Drafting ADR Provisions in Merger Agreements

The Delaware Supreme Court upheld that an arbitration clause covering earn‑out calculations also encompasses bad‑faith claims about those calculations in the Fortis Advisors v. Stillfront merger dispute. The case involved Stillfront’s 2019 $90 million acquisition of Kixeye, with an earn‑out tied...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Activist That Encouraged Merger Only To Change Its Mind Denied “Extraordinary Remedy” Of A Deal Injunction
NewsMar 18, 2026

Activist That Encouraged Merger Only To Change Its Mind Denied “Extraordinary Remedy” Of A Deal Injunction

The Delaware Court of Chancery rejected HoldCo’s request for an injunction to block Comerica’s merger with Fifth Third, finding the deal‑protection provisions lawful and not coercive. HoldCo, which had initially championed the transaction, could not demonstrate a colorable claim or irreparable...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)
Shareholder Engagement in Flux: Recent Developments and Practical Implications
NewsFeb 10, 2026

Shareholder Engagement in Flux: Recent Developments and Practical Implications

The SEC’s recent clarification of Rule 14a‑8 reshapes how companies must handle shareholder proposals, while regulators intensify scrutiny of proxy advisors. Concurrently, vote‑no/withhold campaigns and new retail voting programs are gaining traction, adding complexity to the 2026 proxy season. Updated guidance...

By Enhanced Scrutiny (Sidley M&A Litigation)