
From Access Reviews to Decision Governance
The article argues that traditional quarterly access reviews, which verify static role and group assignments, are losing relevance as organizations adopt policy‑driven, context‑aware authorization models. In modern zero‑trust environments, access decisions are calculated at runtime based on attributes such as device posture, location, time and risk scores. This shift creates a gap: managers can confirm a user’s group membership but cannot see how dynamic policies actually grant or deny access. The author proposes a new “decision governance” framework that audits the policies, attributes, and decision engines themselves rather than just the static artifacts.

Low-Code by Design: A Practical Way to Modernize Identity Governance
Low‑Code by Design reframes identity governance automation by building reusable, metadata‑driven integration modules instead of bespoke scripts. The approach captures application attributes such as account models and correlation rules, allowing a single tested component to be configured for many systems....