
Law librarians hosted a tabling event to introduce students to emerging legal AI tools such as Lexis Protégé and Westlaw Deep Research, encountering both enthusiasm and skepticism. They used live demonstrations, clear disclaimers about court and academic rules, and a neutral tone to avoid appearing as vendors. The staff emphasized competence with the platforms and taught prompt‑writing techniques to ensure effective use. Ultimately, the library positioned itself as a trusted hub for AI information literacy in legal education.

A senior lawyer’s preference for generative AI over a junior associate sparked debate about the true capabilities of AI tools. The article stresses that current models, even Retrieval‑Augmented Generation systems, can hallucinate and lack genuine understanding. It argues that lawyers...