Rahm Emanuel on the Strait of Hormuz Crisis

Why It Matters

Emanuel’s plan seeks to diminish the Strait of Hormuz’s choke‑point power, safeguarding global trade and stabilizing energy markets amid rising geopolitical tensions.

Key Takeaways

• Emanuel proposes total closure or unrestricted flow of Strait traffic.
• Suggests UN‑run toll system to fund regional reconstruction.
• Recommends using Abraham Accords to finance alternative pipelines.
• Calls for routes via Oman and Red Sea to bypass Hormuz.
• Aims to lower global economic risk from Strait disruptions.

Summary

Rahm Emanuel used a recent interview to frame the Strait of Hormuz as a strategic flashpoint that could cripple global energy markets if left unchecked. He argued that the United States and its allies must adopt a clear policy—either keep the waterway fully open or seal it entirely—to eliminate ambiguity in diplomatic negotiations.

Emanuel outlined three concrete steps: first, a binary decision on traffic; second, establishing a United Nations‑controlled toll system whose proceeds would fund reconstruction across the region, not just Iran; and third, leveraging the Abraham Accords as a financing mechanism for new pipelines that circumvent the strait, routing oil through Oman and the Red Sea.

He emphasized, “either all boats in and out or no boats in and out,” and suggested that a UN‑run toll could become a multilateral revenue stream for rebuilding war‑torn infrastructure. By repurposing the Accords, he envisions private‑sector capital flowing into alternative energy corridors, reducing reliance on the Hormuz chokepoint.

If adopted, these proposals could dilute the strait’s leverage over oil prices, diversify supply routes, and reshape geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, offering investors and policymakers a more resilient framework for energy security.

Original Description

“We went in to deal with their nuclear capacity, and they discovered they have a nuclear option. It’s called the Strait of Hormuz,” says Rahm Emanuel, former U.S. ambassador to Japan and former White House chief of staff.

Subscribe to our channel: https://goo.gl/WCYsH7

This work represents the views and opinions solely of the author. The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher, and takes no institutional positions on matters of policy.

Visit the CFR website: http://www.cfr.org

Follow CFR on X: http://www.twitter.com/cfr_org

Follow CFR on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations/