Caroline Figueroa | Towards Responsible AI for Adolescent Mental Health and Well-Being
Why It Matters
Adolescent reliance on AI for emotional support is growing rapidly, demanding concrete safeguards to prevent harm while leveraging AI’s unique, judgment‑free benefits for youth mental health.
Key Takeaways
- •Teens use AI chatbots for emotional support, 12% overall, 18% 18‑21
- •90% of teen users find AI mental‑health advice somewhat helpful
- •Responsible AI frameworks agree on oversight, but lack concrete guidance
- •Youth see AI as judgment‑free space, yet fear dependency
- •Potential harms include privacy breaches, bias, and crisis‑mismanagement in practice
Summary
The seminar featured Caroline Figueroa, an assistant professor at Delft University, discussing how generative AI is reshaping adolescent mental‑health support and the urgent need for responsible AI frameworks. Drawing on surveys and her own qualitative study of 84 teens, she highlighted that roughly 12% of teenagers use AI chatbots for mental‑health advice, rising to 18% among 18‑21‑year‑olds, and that about 90% of those users consider the advice somewhat or very helpful.
Figueroa compared existing responsible‑AI guidelines from eleven civil‑society bodies, noting unanimous calls for oversight, addiction‑prevention, and monitoring, but also a lack of specific, actionable rules—especially around age‑based restrictions and positive AI features. Her focus‑group research revealed a nuanced youth perspective: AI offers a judgment‑free, always‑available outlet for venting, conflict rehearsal, and self‑reflection, yet teens worry about privacy, bias, and becoming overly dependent.
Illustrative quotes included a teen who used ChatGPT with a friend to defuse a conflict without adult involvement, and another who described AI as “talking to the void,” providing a safe space to disclose secrets. However, the data also underscored risks: with 900 million weekly active users, even a sub‑1% emergency flag translates to roughly 600,000 potentially vulnerable teens each week, raising concerns about crisis mismanagement and emotional attachment.
The findings suggest policymakers and developers must move beyond high‑level principles toward enforceable standards that protect young users while preserving AI’s therapeutic benefits. Targeted age‑based safeguards, transparent data practices, and integrated human‑in‑the‑loop support could mitigate harms and harness AI’s promise for adolescent well‑being.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...