Reforming Therapy: Addressing Bias and Building Trust (Ft. Andrew Hartz)

Why It Matters

Bias in psychotherapy limits access for large demographic groups, risking poorer mental‑health outcomes and eroding public trust; addressing it creates both ethical and market incentives for more inclusive care.

Key Takeaways

• Therapy field heavily leans left, creating ideological bias.
• Conservative patients report being dismissed or referred out for views.
• Lack of research on anti-conservative bias leaves training gaps.
• Open Therapy Institute aims to provide unbiased, values‑aligned care.
• Addressing faith, gun ownership, and gender issues can broaden access.

Summary

The episode examines a growing perception that mainstream psychotherapy is ideologically skewed toward liberal viewpoints, leaving many conservative, religious, or gun‑owning patients feeling alienated. Host Raphael Mangal interviews Andrew Hartz, founder of the Open Therapy Institute, who argues that roughly 90% of therapists identify as left‑leaning and that academic training reinforces this bias, resulting in patients being turned away for holding majority‑view opinions.

Hartz cites concrete examples: a patient denied a fellowship after labeling affirmative‑action policies racist, therapists publicly denouncing white males, and a lack of scholarly articles on anti‑conservative bias in top psychology journals. He also highlights systemic blind spots such as minimal training on faith‑based issues and firearms safety, despite polls showing clinicians feel underprepared.

Notable moments include Hartz’s description of articles calling “whiteness a pathological narcissism,” a meme about therapists misunderstanding gun ownership, and a poignant anecdote about a trans‑related therapy letter that caused emotional distress. He also references his Wall Street Journal piece and the institute’s first accredited continuing‑education course on working with gun owners.

The discussion underscores the business opportunity for a neutral therapeutic platform that trains clinicians on politically and culturally sensitive topics, potentially expanding the market to millions of underserved patients. By addressing these biases, the mental‑health field could improve outcomes, restore trust among conservative communities, and mitigate risks such as untreated suicidality or violence.

Original Description

Open Therapy Institute founder Andrew Hartz and Rafael Mangual explore the growing influence of political bias in psychotherapy and what it means for both therapists and clients. He discusses the importance of intellectual diversity in training, the need for more balanced and rigorous research, and how therapy can better serve individuals with differing values. The conversation also dives into broader cultural issues—including masculinity, faith, and political polarization—and examines how these topics show up in the therapy room. Andrew makes the case for a more open, inclusive approach to mental health care that respects personal beliefs while still promoting growth and well-being.

Get the best of City Journal, delivered weekly:

https://www.city-journal.org/email-alerts

Follow City Journal on X: https://x.com/CityJournal

Andrew Hartz: https://x.com/Hartz_PhD

Rafael Mangual: https://x.com/Rafa_Mangual

00:00 Introduction to the Open Therapy Institute

00:49 Political Bias in Mental Health

05:32 Challenges in Therapy for Conservative Patients

08:42 Goals of the Open Therapy Institute

10:42 Misconceptions About Therapy

13:51 The Impact of Political Issues on Therapy

19:00 Training Future Psychologists

23:46 When Therapy Might Not Be Beneficial

28:36 Therapy in Policing and Public Safety

31:44 The Feminization of Therapy

35:30 Societal Views on Masculinity

40:35 The Role of Therapy in Addressing Criminal Behavior