
WSJ What’s News
Understanding tariff volatility is crucial for investors and companies navigating supply‑chain costs and regulatory risk, while the AI model‑theft allegations underscore emerging threats to intellectual property and national security. The episode’s blend of trade policy, market impact, and tech security offers timely insight for anyone tracking the intersecting forces shaping the U.S. economy.
The week’s market turbulence was dominated by renewed tariff uncertainty. After the Supreme Court ruled President Trump’s global tariffs illegal, the Dow plunged 1.7 % and the S&P fell 1 %, reflecting investors’ anxiety over the president’s subsequent pledge to re‑impose 10‑15 % tariffs. Analysts linked the sell‑off to lingering doubts about trade policy, potential refunds for affected firms, and the broader geopolitical backdrop, including Middle‑East tensions. This volatile environment forced business leaders to reassess exposure and prepare for rapid policy shifts.
Large multinationals have turned the uncertainty into a data‑driven exercise. Companies such as Boston Consulting Group maintain war rooms and algorithmic trade‑parameter models that can simulate tariff outcomes within hours, allowing CEOs to adjust supply chains instantly. In contrast, small firms face a steep learning curve; a Pennsylvania bridal‑wear shop reported price hikes of 8‑14 % and worries that customers will demand refunds on tariff‑inflated goods. The disparity highlights how sophisticated analytics protect big players, while mom‑and‑pop businesses grapple with compliance costs, legal ambiguities, and consumer backlash.
At the same time, the tech sector wrestles with AI model distillation disputes. Anthropic accused three Chinese firms—DeepSeek, Moonshot AI and Minimax—of prompting its Claude system millions of times to clone the model cheaply, raising U.S. national‑security alarms about unguarded AI replicas. OpenAI has voiced similar concerns, suggesting a broader industry threat. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical headlines added pressure: Novo Nordisk’s obesity drug faltered against Eli Lilly’s Zepbound, sending its shares down 16 % while Lilly’s stock rose nearly 5 %. Together, trade policy volatility, AI intellectual‑property battles, and competitive drug pipelines illustrate the multi‑front risk landscape confronting investors and executives.
P.M. Edition for Feb. 23. U.S. stocks were down today after the latest tariff moves over the weekend, while U.S. business leaders are scrambling to figure out what this means for them. We hear from reporter Chip Cutter about the questions they have and how they’re trying to address them. Plus, Anthropic has accused three Chinese AI companies of using its Claude model to improve their own systems. WSJ reporter Robert McMillan discusses why Anthropic says that’s a threat to national security… and its business. And the Pentagon is flagging risks of a major operation against Iran to President Trump. Alex Ossola hosts.
Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...