Bad at Sports
Episode 935: Chicago Critics Roundtable
Why It Matters
Understanding how critics operate today reveals how cultural narratives are formed and who gets to influence art markets and public taste. As legacy media contracts, these independent voices become crucial for amplifying diverse artists and sustaining a vibrant local art scene, making the episode especially relevant for anyone invested in the future of cultural discourse.
Key Takeaways
- •Critics discuss resurgence amid art criticism crisis.
- •Chicago's multi‑hyphenate critics blend writing, curating, making.
- •Art ecology often omits critics, highlighting their ecosystem role.
- •Subjectivity vs. journalistic objectivity debated in contemporary criticism.
- •Criticism seen as democratic conversation, not mere reportage.
Pulse Analysis
The Bad at Sports roundtable gathered Chicago’s leading voices—Curtis Bozif, Annette LaPeak, Pia Singh, Gareth Kaye, and host Duncan McKenzie—to confront what they call the ‘crisis of criticism.’ Participants noted that the buzzword ‘art ecology’ frequently lists artists, galleries, and collectors but leaves critics invisible, despite their essential function in the ecosystem. The conversation traced the podcast’s origin as a response to that omission, recalling past guests like James Elkins and Michelle Grabner. By framing criticism as a revitalizing force, the panel signaled a possible resurgence in thoughtful, independent art writing.
A striking theme was the multi‑hyphenate identity of Chicago’s critics. Many juggle roles as painters, curators, educators, and writers, a reality shaped by the city’s limited market and neoliberal pressures. Annette LaPeak highlighted her cross‑publication experience, while Pia Singh emphasized her Indian‑American perspective that drives her to write for under‑represented audiences. Gareth Kaye admitted a recent hiatus from formal reviews, yet his Substack keeps the dialogue alive. This blend of practice and theory informs how they select subjects—often guided by personal taste, cultural resonance, and a desire to fill gaps left by mainstream media.
The panel agreed that criticism functions less as objective journalism and more as a democratic conversation. By publishing subjective, poetically charged essays, critics give works a ‘voice in the bottle’ that can attract collectors, spark public interest, and validate artists’ labor. In an era of shrinking legacy media, such independent platforms become vital for sustaining the Chicago art scene and for challenging the notion that criticism must be neutral. Their collective optimism suggests that a vibrant, inclusive critical ecosystem can thrive when writers embrace their multiple hats and prioritize honest, passionate discourse.
Episode Description
[audio src="https://traffic.libsyn.com/badatsports/badatsportsepisodeCHICAGOCRITICROUNDTABLE_01.mp3"]
download
Guests: Annette LePique, Curtis Anthony Bozif, Pia Singh, Gareth Kaye
Recorded with the support of Columbia College Chicago - Colum.edu
What happens when you gather a room full of critics in a moment when criticism itself feels both endangered and newly alive? In this long-awaited return to the Chicago Critics Roundtable, Duncan sits down with a new multi-hyphenate crew of writers, curators, artists, and exhibition-makers to unpack the shifting role of criticism in a fractured “art ecology.”
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...