Conversations | Who Builds the Canon? Infrastructure, Authorship, and Digital Culture
Why It Matters
As digital artworks become central to contemporary culture, redefining authorship, valuation, and institutional legitimacy will shape the future market and historical record of art.
Key Takeaways
- •Digital art's canon shifting from galleries to blockchain platforms.
- •Artists gain global reach but face new collector education challenges.
- •Curators must translate traditional expertise into decentralized digital contexts.
- •Online exhibitions prioritize simple curation over immersive VR experiences.
- •Rightclick Save bridges art criticism and community-driven discourse.
Summary
The final conversation of Art Basel Hong Kong 2026 explored who constructs the art canon in an era defined by digital infrastructure, authorship, and evolving cultural norms. Moderated by Eli Shinman, the panel featured curator Sunny Chong of M+, multidisciplinary artist Amy Kusano, and Rightclick Save founder Tony, each offering distinct perspectives on how blockchain, online platforms, and institutional practices intersect. Key insights highlighted the tension between the promise of decentralization and the realities of market dynamics. Amy described how pandemic‑era NFTs propelled her from a Japanese‑language community to exhibitions in New York and London, yet she noted that traditional collectors find mint‑and‑sell mechanisms overwhelming. Sunny emphasized that curatorial authority is now distributed across multiple knowledge bases, from blockchain provenance to digital preservation concerns such as bit‑rot. Tony outlined Rightclick Save’s mission to provide non‑selling, text‑driven online exhibitions that serve as a bridge between conventional art criticism and participatory community discourse. Notable moments included Amy’s anecdote about learning English through global collector interactions, Sunny’s comparison of disc‑magazine culture to today’s decentralized networks, and Tony’s vision of a simple, text‑focused exhibition model that avoids immersive VR while encouraging open forums for critique. The panel also underscored the paradox that price often precedes scholarly discourse in the digital art market, prompting a call for more structured evaluation frameworks. The discussion signals a broader institutional shift: museums and galleries must adapt to digital preservation, provenance verification, and inclusive curatorial practices. For investors and artists alike, understanding these new power dynamics is essential to navigating valuation, reputation building, and the long‑term sustainability of digital art’s place in the cultural canon.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...